Very viable with current medical technology ergo the rights of the mother are balanced against those of the person of the child.

You are incorrect. Revisit Roe v. Wade for more info.

Your view is not informed by science. The conception is separate from you from genetics from the moment of conception. In this case religion and science agree.

You are not on the front lines, I get that. But a fetus at 20 weeks can survive with current technology...ergo..it’s viable.

Bundy is part of the public as well.

As a practicing physician, im required to be aware of science and medical law.

If someone had suggested to me that I should be frightened to interview adolescents by myself I’d have laughed in their face. This is a ridiculous hyperbole that dosent ring true. Sorry, epic fail.

Which is why they voted for Trump. Are you blind?

Their point is it’s public land........belongs to them as members of the public. How do you intend to counter that argument? Hint snark not effective.

If it is public land...the public should have access to it.

Data and law sets viability at twenty weeks.

Agreed. But a twenty week fetus is viable outside of its mom...and it is a person per established law.

Exactly.

Actually. A baby is viable at 20 weeks of gestation whereupon it has all the rights you do.

Fetus is Latin for baby. A person that is viable at 20 weeks. Your colon polyps have only your genetics. A baby has its own.

You are wrong on both counts.

At twenty weeks “it” can.

These entire hearings are a waste of public funds. Confirm the nominees and get to work fools.

Nice logical argument. Bless your heart!

Until it interferes with my rights.