no you WEREN’T supposed to put beef in the trifle

*roc sign emoji*

*ranks Classical ahead of Hip Hop*

trill. the trillest.

morally indefensible that HBO didn't stick to dramatizing consensual incest.

my heart is with this post. the soul of the internet is with this post. salute, homegirl.

Ah, fair enough. "Black men chase white women, hate black women" is an old trope but enduring—and, I think, more publicly prominent among straight black women in re black men than the other way around. From where I'm sitting, at least.

Wait. You think that rage is unique to black men in re black women? Am I misreading you?

Pretty sure they were thinking, if we put Malcolm X on the cover, think-piece Twitter will devour bait, and that's the game. Touchdown: YMCMB! Marketing, indeed.

What's your wisdom or credibility to tell artists what their art means and what it can/can't do? Are you Bruce Almighty or something?

"lyricism."

"Brooklynbarrassment" and "projection" are indistinguishable terms.

Whatever you think of the party, this post is clever, and we're all morons. EGR knows, and late-reveals, that this party is possibly hosted by some mix of white and brown people. (Which is irrelevant.) But several paragraphs prior, the post intros with a flat declaration of the bar and hosts' identities that (I'll…

"Anyone can show up, including assholes going around yelling "Ni hao ma!" or putting on a "fob" accent at one point (it was just a joke, lighten up guys!) or creeps with a bad case of yellow fever ..."

That's a dope jacket.

Is different people's having different perspectives on what's right and wrong with Huma Abedin really as confusing as the last couple paragraphs mean to suggest?