swamijie
swamijie
swamijie

No, paid attention to his system, learned its quirks and glitches and made a reasoned decision that the message that told him to tell his superiors that the US started WWIII was a computer error and reported that instead to his superiors... and yeah, living in New York City, me my wife and my daughter are quite glad

Someone 'splain to the nice person what "theory" means in science! The Big Bang "theory" that explains or describes the "possible" beginning of our Universe just like the "theory"of gravitation "possibly" explains why we stick to the ground (of course there is the Gorilla Glue Theory of why people in the southern

Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine: bunch of PETA hacks posing as experts in pseudoscience. When it comes to anything having to do with animal food sources, one has to take their "research" or "data" and "evidence" with more than a grain of salt.

uhh no, global warming is happening, the headline says "What Might Happen If Global Warming Continues" and we probably will have intelligent lizards replacing humans that are too dumb to look after their own survival...

..by the way data analysis can be massaged to show anything, but that's where the peer review process and the sharing of findings so other scientists can analyze and attempt to replicate the findings and claims and data comes in.

No, if the data doesn't support climate change, then it doesn't. He or she reports it and that's that. The scientist isn't studying global warming per se but climate patterns and that is what's reported. A scientist isn't out of a job if their findings don't show what they want them to show, unless they work for a

No, if the data doesn't support climate change, then it doesn't. He or she reports it and that's that. The scientist isn't studying global warming per se but climate patterns and that is what's reported. A scientist isn't out of a job if their findings don't show what they want them to show, unless they work for a