See also: Walker, Herschel.

It’s what they give you when pico de gallo is too spicy.

I was okay with him before he came to my house, put a basket over my head and then stole all my stuff!

“Because I wouldn’t get five minutes into the first show before I’d been cancelled or censored.”

Having worked at a grocery store and had to collect those discarded carts, I take umbrage with this statement.

I thought of the alien abduction sketches too but it felt different enough to not be a complete rehash. I did like the secondary bit about Lorne telling that guy it’s fine he doesn’t write anything or appear in any sketches for a while.

Eyes was fun. 

I’ve been out for over 30 years and now I have to decide between staying in Europe and risking Putin losing it completely and setting off some A-bombs near where I live or returning to an increasingly fascist country and a formerly brilliant father who’s now suffering from Q brain rot.

Did you even read the HP2 review? Here are the two DCOM mentions:

“Playing like a big-budget “Disney Channel Original Movie” for the millennial crowd but with a more character-driven narrative, this overdue sequel to the 29-year-old original offers a surprisingly clever and, at times (blushes) heartfelt continuation…

Think of how handy it would have been if this review would have told us when/where we can watch it. 

Like this old nugget

“

Again!?

That’s just the sort of thing a deepfake would say..

“Someday, if I’m ever released from prison, I hope to continue on this path of bettering myself.”

seems to me he killed his mom so she wouldnt be emotionally wrecked over the high score he was gonna shoot for.

Interesting point. With acronyms for organizations it seems our trend is to start with “the” then eventually drop its use. Like we don’t say “The CBS” or “The NBC” (don’t know if we ever did). I work for an organization where about half of the people say “the” before the acronym and the other folks don’t.

Cheugy is the nyquil chicken of words.

I wouldn’t Grantham parole either.

I don't get the snarkiness of this article. Those rules sound good to me but it sounds like you don't think there should be a clear delination between content and advertising for children whose brains aren't developed enough to tell the difference, I guess?