“You hate the exploitative nature of AI under Late Stage Capitalism? Then you must hate TECHNOLOGY!”

It was actually heavily featured on the main page, even if marketing was lacking it was eye popping enough to draw my interest. Highly recommend the series to those who enjoyed to the two anthology series for Star Was. Lots of smaller studios that the majority of us are unaware of that put out great content. 

I hope its still on Disney + next time I resub, but considering they have done nothing to advertise it, I would not be shocked if it gets Willowed.

Zeus turned into animals to have sex with women all the damn time. Sartyrs were half goat and *really* horny. Sailors have been drowning themselves for a chance at half-fish poontang for millenia.

Beastiality is wrong because animals cannot consent. But intelligent monster-people who resemble animals have always been a target for lust, see all of the various sexy werewolf fiction. Wild shaped druids would absolutely fall into this category.

The average AVClub poster named dudebra makes 2 millions dollars a post.  It’s true. I heard it on the internet 

Salary.com says $53,148.

[citation needed]

“Company That Uses AI to Make Money Defends Use of AI in Making Money”

And people still bitch that she was fridged even though that word has no meaning.

Yeah it’s like money itself.

Due to the way wizards prints and ships foil cards it’s not possible to have a foil be “perfect”. A 9 is honestly higher than I would have thought it could achieve but tbh the thing that makes it worth anything is the 1/1 serialization. It could be pringled, marked, even slightly damaged and still probably pull a…

Oh man, I can wait for you to find out money isn’t real

If you learned how to read entire articles and not just headlines, you’d see it’s “valued” at that because a store put out a bounty offering that much to whoever found it. Remains to be see if they follow through, I know another one that offered 1 million confirmed with the finder they’re ready to buy if he wants to…

Yes sending teen boys your worn panties and bras is not grooming? Sending sexual questions to a teen is not grooming? Someone check on Scarge I think they might be a groomer as well.

I’m glad we have the founder’s words directly from his mouth, because up until now, we’ve only been able to assume that he’s wildly out of touch and shoved up his own ass. Now we have proof!

Mr. Hankey, follow me down this logic trail for a minute... The most profitable period your company had was during COVID when…

There are clear examples of grooming in this situation. It’s definitely a term that’s been loaded and misused in a lot of situations, but being in communication with an underaged fan and sending him underwear and asking sexual questions falls squarely under the term.

Eh, I don’t know if it’s grooming, but...

The major difference being that Cruise, as far as we know, never held people hostage. Being a Scientologist and being a sociopath are NOT equivalent.

...except the “inmates” are already the ones “running the asylum”?