Thinking out loud about where a problem can be solved is somehow bad? I get you don’t like the anti-union stance he took in Fremont as your a union lobbyist but the guy is advancing the rest of the progressive agenda daily:
svelasquez123
svelasquez123
“all of this public mourning for a canine life that was purposefully sacrificed by its owner, made to attack a basically unarmed man who was surrounded by cops”
The shot heard nowhere
Or get our news on the subject from a site that regularly advertised for the industry.
The lawyers should have some skin in the game when filing these claims (non-refundable fee or must hand-write and serve claims in person). They shouldn’t be allowed to throw an automated net amidst the other scammer noise and catch unsuspecting persons with these massive “automatic” penalties.
Greed. Got paid for an asset that the customer was too hurried to vet.
The report didn’t state that it was a necessarily democratic candidate.
Your ability to protect yourself may be limited in the future by laws created to make it illegal for people who ignore laws to get a gun. At the same time, there is constant pressure on those enforcing the laws to not do their job while also removing penalties for those who break the laws. Your gun and the right to…
Maybe lens is designed to only absorb higher energy wavelengths (UV) and allow the rest to pass through. I have the vivo active 3 and I leave the back light off which works fine except at night and I get 7 days on one charge. Almost a month with upgraded battery supplemented with solar would be amazing. Maybe a…
“...launched 24 investigations and levied fines for 54 violations on a single Tesla facility”
It would be pretty remarkable for OSHA to not investigate any company of that size 200 times and find fewer than 51 violations. Hell, Univision has 171 inspections and way more than 51 violations according to OSHAs website. What the hell you guys doing over there?
(S)“he can’t take the high horse and then claim the low road.” -GWB
I hate hate hate when government steps in to stomp on a company’s success with regulation but at some point, it should offer some protection from monopolistic threats. You should be an internet connectivity provider or a content provider, not both. Otherwise, you will want to prioritize availability of your content…
...or at the very least should not be capable of generating revenue. There is no way this is an isolated case.
Honestly, how is donating a building any different than the “deception and fraud”? The usual people didn’t get their cut?
That’s the same thing Amazon said about retail workers.
Um, motive? What kind of con would he be attempting to perpetrate by being concerned? You (Gawker leftovers) are obviously getting paid to lobby on behalf of the vape industry. There is an article similar to this like ever 2 weeks on one of these sites.
Sure, if you want to walk around looking like your blowing a malfunctioning dildo and possibly race toward a early permanent retirement while offending those around you try this out.
I agree with the distinction between fraud vs. influence. Influence has been a part of every election and will continue to be regardless of what is done. I don’t know if state actors are any more a threat than corporate actors but that’s a different discussion.