surturius2
Surturius
surturius2

Let’s be honest. The real solution to this problem isn’t to get rid of or “update” the character of Apu. It’s to end the fucking show already! The Simpsons was amazing in the late 80's and the 90's, but it’s not relevant anymore. Apu is far from the only outdated thing on the show.

You’re forgetting that the reason they voted the way they did is presumably because they were paid to do so.

Why the fuck does America still call them Indians? Seriously, what the hell.

The woman who brought the screen to life with her dynamic performance on Suits will surely enthrall a crowd of British dignitaries who have never seen a woman in a wedding dress speak before.

I can only speak for myself, but I have a very hard time wrapping my head around the idea that any guy would not understand what it means if a woman moves his hand. To me, it was just as clear as if my wife had actually said “no, I don’t want this.” The only way I would even consider putting my hand back there during

I don’t disagree that being able to say no and walk away is a good skill to have (although, as has been frequently pointed out, this can sometimes be dangerous/lead to violence, so... easier said than done). But that’s not the real issue - the real issue that needs to be addressed is that push-ers, as you call them,

I think it was a few dates later. I just tried again while we were making out, and she got into it that time.

As a man, this kind of argument is super weird to me, and I’ve really been baffled by the way men are reacting to this story.

Honestly, I can’t get too angry at Marky Mark about this. He does have a right to get paid for his work. You can argue that he gets paid too much, and you can certainly argue that he’s a shitty person in other ways, but if he’s gonna reshoot all his scenes, he deserves to get paid for them and should be able to

The thing is, flirting isn’t even the problem. You shouldn’t be doing it at work, but the way these guys are talking about it is really just trivializing the actual problem. Harvey Weinstein, Louis C.K., Bill O’Reilly - none of these men got in trouble for flirting. They got in trouble for forcing women to watch them

I’m so sick of this argument. Why would the amount of time it takes to commit a crime absolve you of wrongdoing?

Yeahhh, religious folks will tell you that god was “testing you” or some shit. But I’ve never understood why a being that would do that to people is worthy of worship. Like, maybe if he gave an actual explanation for the purpose of such a fucked up test. But no. You’re just supposed to assume there is a purpose, and

I can’t say that I have, no.

I remember when the whole Nate Parker story broke, and he was talking about what he could do to redeem himself, how he was asking women he knew for advice and stuff. And I remember thinking about that question myself - how could someone like that make this right, is there any way a rapist could do something that would

I don’t know how it’ll happen, but it’s pretty obvious there isn’t going to be a happy ending for Jon and Dany. Why would anyone think there’s going to be a happy ending for them?

I want this game, but I find the look of it really bland, which bums me out a bit. Really wish they would have gone with a more interesting art style.

My parents gave me free food for years. Somehow I learned not to continue relying on them for it as an adult.

In order to successfully increase the safety of non-binary, intersex and trans folks, Canada needs to do more work to lobby internationally to remove gender markers on passports...

Yeah, this. I actually do believe that that’s what he was doing, but... what a stupid fucking thing to do.

I wonder if he’s like, SO used to calling him Martin Luther Coon that he forgot what the real name was.