Ummmmmmmmmmm
No.
Ummmmmmmmmmm
No.
I was downed in one of these trenches and 2 of my allies came to revive me. As soon as I was arrived, an enemy jumped from the top of the trench, killing me as soon as I was revived.
I was so confused, but it was pretty great.
“First, God is beyond our comprehension.”
I really hate this argument. God isn’t “beyond our comprehension”. God is a fictional character that people keep moving the goal posts for to prevent their belief of him from being shattered.
Because yeah, I’m sure, that God created the universe as we know it, created this one…
But you didn’t bring in a legitimate point of view. You’re browsing a routinely NSFW site at work and are worried about people seeing what’s on your monitor?
Do you leave these pages open on your monitor and walk away from your desk?
This is a ‘you’ problem, not a Kotaku problem. If you are so afraid of getting caught…
When you’re both that big and strong, it wouldn’t take much for either to knock eachother out. The reach is important and so is the weight, but Charles seems like he wouldn’t have a problem with that. I don’t get the impression Shaq would know how to even use his reach or weight advantage.
Gordon Ramsay looks weird in this
“Pro-tip: if you don’t want to be seen as condescending at best and sexist at worst, maybe don’t call grown women “girls.””
Can I tell my female coworkers in their 50's who call eachother “girl” this?
Meh, the shot was ok.
The most intimidating, Canadian saying in history:
Those short white kids didn’t stand a chance.
So you would rather read an article of scientists saying “probably” “maybe” “possibly” in almost every sentence instead of them prefacing the article with “we suspect that” and not using “probably” “maybe” “possibly” etc. in every sentence?
Yeah, I would rather go with the latter.
I don’t think you understand how the world works.
“there’s something unique or novel about the games in either presentation or execution that prompted them being written about. This is exactly what I’m talking about.”
And what makes it different then what they normally review? Kotaku doesn’t review every RPG or FPS or RTS game that comes out. They only review or…
“3 boxes is generally nothing of value”
It’s gambling. You could get 3 boxes of legendaries and epics or you could get 3 boxes of crap. Regardless, the more you play, the more stuff you get, which means the more duplicates and coins you get which makes it easier to buy skins.
At a point the odds don’t matter because you…
Still don’t know if I buy your argument:
You make it sound like it’s so time consuming and difficult. 9 games = 3 loot boxes a week, leveling requires less experience now, they usually give away a loot box or 2 for launching the event. It’s not that bad or dramatic as you make it seem, unless you play 1 match a night.
Uhhhh, you can buy these skins with coins that you can earn without spending a dollar. No gambling required.
What? They’ve covered sex and nudity mods that were incorporated in Sims 4. They cover other sex/nudity/whatever mods for games quite a bit, like Skyrim as another example. There have been a couple of other games that I can’t remember off the top of my head but regardless, weird sex/nudity mod coverage is no stranger…
“But then, it wouldn’t get a story on Kotaku, would it?”
What’s the point of this part of your comment? Kotaku has covered sex games, including hentai games on this site. lol
Was terrible if you had dogs and carpet though. Bounce it around a few times and then you spend 10 minutes picking fur out of it.