So research from the New England Law Review journal is invalid because a feminist later wrote about it.

Um, okay. You criticized those groups yourself, though, so your "I'm not going to respond" stance is pretty strange, bro.

Yet...your screen name.

K, thx

That's great that you don't care about those groups, but the fact is that those groups are the public face of your movement, simply because they're the loudest and they attract the most attention. It's just like the shitty Evangelicals who hate everyone that's not exactly like them, who end up giving a bad name to…

No it isn't:

A person can become involved with their former partner and take a parental role toward a child after a lengthy absence, but this requires the consent and participation of the former partner.

I'm not going to argue with you. It's a fact, it's been true for a very long time. Men don't get physical custody because they don't ask for it.

Yep, not to mention that custody decisions are based on the "best interest of the child," which is almost always determined by who has been doing the primary caretaking of the child/ren.

The child custody system is already far, and has been for quite a while. MRAs who say the system is loaded against them are definitely not correct.

Your preconceptions about the MRA movement are very inaccurate.

That happened to my cousin. She's still in court over it, since the father was involved for a time when the kid was 3 or so (he's 10 now). She's willing to have a partial arrangment, less than half time, but this guy wants an even split.

When men seek custody, they receive it 83% of the time. The MRA movement is all about harassing women, and Patric is no different.

Maybe you should explain that to all the internet MRA groups, because that's how the majority seem to act.

Wow, this is excellent.

If you want to troll without reading the post, just go ahead and troll without bothering with the block quotes.

Kelly I think you did try to be very fair in your article. But I also got the feeling that you think his response is BS and that you really believe her. You cite mostly articles tearing down his response and say her tumblr post is "the whole story". It is most certainly NOT the whole story, it is just the beginning of…

But you're not him, so you don't know what would serve him best. You have no idea what he remembers, what he feels, let alone what he did. What you do know, is that you don't know if he raped her or not. You're treading on dangerously arrogant ground.

That is what I was saying. In my opinion the article is heavily written to sway the reader into thinking Temkin is guilty. Also many people are choosing to boycott his company based off of a very sparse accusation where further evidence is needed.

This is very true. Most of the guys I know are kind of slutty and they're busy fucking women: sometimes a little younger, sometimes a little older, blondes, brunettes, women of all shapes and sizes. They're not constantly bitching about sex and women's looks and bodies because they're actually fucking and dating and…