@silver-bolt: luckily there's a whole asteroid belt out there full of more than we can count.

@stereobot: dead on. you cannot travel "to the past" because the simple fact is that "the past" no longer exists. there is only ever the present.

@Althestane: no no, everything WAS kinda predetermined. very important to keep your tenses in order when time-traveling.

there is either one universe and no time travel (beyond a sub-atomic scale, which demonstrates self-fulfillment anyway), or there are infinite parallel universes and time travel makes nothing mean anything whatsoever. since the universe seems to make more and more sense every time we discover one of its secrets, i…

@MistaWondaBread: during your deployment, did you meet a single private security guard that carried an ak47, an rpg launcher, and brought their kids along in the van?

interesting story. i think lamo did the right thing.

this looks terrible. the reason sci-fi concepts work so well in anime is that it costs practically the same amount to make a ridiculous scenario as it does to make a mundane one, with live action the special effects necessary to replicate that setting are cost-prohibitive. also, tall dude isnt tall, big breast girl…

neeto. one step closer to a holodeck.

too bad cheney didnt run for, and win, the presidency- first black president should have waited, we could have had our very first cyborg president!

@Mindfield: zombie? no, cyborg.

@superdemon: correction: global warming is still stupider.

this is possibly the stupidest bit of science ive ever seen. i understand that theyre just trying to be cute, but still.

@higeseal_the_heretic: journalism is no longer driven by a search for the truth (if it ever wholly was), its now mostly just a parrot dance.

@SynicVance2.0: the chances of that are pretty low, historically. of course "at some point," but the birthrate of average rational people is well below that.

@SynicVance2.0: i didnt say octomom had a tax problem, i said responsible people have a tax problem. if we didnt have to give half of our money to the government, then a common household could survive on one income, and you can certainly raise more than 2 or 3 kids if one of the parents can stay home.

@superdemon: 7 million? duh. 7 billion, i meant.

@SynicVance2.0: our need for animal instinct will never be replaced. and, it is the most technologically advanced of our species that are having the fewest children... meaning the most successful members of our evolutionary path arent breeding... not a good plan. it is not technology replacing our instincts, however-…

@thinkthis: sorry, i misread your statement as insulting the house for being wasteful, though reading it again i realize you were insulting the article for describing it as such. i must agree with you, calling the house anything other than "a cool looking house" is silly.

@thinkthis: mankind isnt environmentally friendly, therefore we should all be killed! you can start by offing yourself.

nipple armor.