supercallipygianfragilisticexpialidocious
Supercallipygianfragilisticexpialidocious
supercallipygianfragilisticexpialidocious

And you’re still seething with butthurt. Unreal. Though I dismissed it, I still would be 100 dollars that your reply contained the letters LOL. So. Very. Sad.

Even if he’s not the QB he once was, he still has ample opportunity to ape Peyton Manning’s style.

Right, but if you follow that logic, then the bottom of a pile becomes essentially a lawless place, and you cannot “possess” the ball until you break free from the occluded and violent orgy of eye-gouging and finger bending...

Is he, though? Has he spoken on, say, education? He may well have and I simply missed it.

Hey, sorry for the radio silence! Been out having... fun? Anyway, you don’t need to hear how swell someone else’s life is, you have plenty on your plate, I can see.

Dude, do yourself a favor. Next time you’re in bed with the flu, say, binge both those puppies. You are in for a treat, it is as good as those things get.

I can see that this one was shorter. Pithy, I’ll bet!

So weird and sad and funny. Once again, dismissed without reading. I wonder what it might have said. Tearful apology? Manful admission of douchebaggery? Or simply more vitriolic, witless hysteria? I’ll never know.

Yep. Just dismissed your latest reply without reading. Dang, you still shore are buttthurttt about this, ain’t ya?

Now playing

Hospital surgeons HATE dermeister! Click here to find out why:

All feelings are valid--or equally invalid, I suppose, if you want to take a nihilistic approach. But the proof is in the pudding--if you shit in the batter, it’s not going to taste very good.

Okay, well I applaud your consistency--I say that without snark. But where we differ is that I feel like people’s feelings matters. And sure, you are free to ignore them, or even to shit directly onto those feelings, but then I would say, don’t act surprised when those people you just shat upon grow hostile to your

Okay. Would you say the same thing about a Koran, to use it as you just described, perhaps at some sort of Muslim festival?

A very good question, one discussed in depth quite recently on this very website.

You are engaging in a logical fallacy, a tu quoque:

I am fighting for those issues by talking, by political volunteering, and by where and how I spend my money. I am not, sadly, famous, so even if I wanted to, I could not do what Kaep is doing.

Yo, liberal fucktards, how the fuck was the platform melted? You think train fuel could really do that?

Actually, while those terms are related, they do not mean the same thing. For example, there are many Muslims who hold what we would consider pretty radical beliefs, but they are interested mainly in their own people(s). Islamists believe in exporting radical Islam to all.

It’s “et all.”

Ah, I see what you mean now. I am fighting against global climate change, for nuclear disarmament, for lodging and health care for the poor, against AIDS and malaria and TB in Africa, against Islamism (oh yes, indeed a word, but not “Islam”)... list goes on and on.