superberg
superberg
superberg

Gee, it's almost liked they want to kill Hulu.

I totally had that NES code tape. Some of those cheat codes were arduous.

Books and movies depreciate no more than games with use.

We still barter. We trade one good, cash, for another, games. Money is an abstract intermediary to make the bartering process easier. Price is negotiable all over the place: cars, construction, rent,

A) The lifespan of non-perishable consumer goods is typically generations. Cars don't fall apart after a year. Pages don't fall out of books after a few weeks. A well-built car lasts decades. A cared for book lasts decades. And more modern forms of entertainment, like DVDs and CDs, are plenty wear-proof. Furniture?

Developers: sharp enough to design games, oblivious enough to think they can change the way economics have worked for over 15,000 years.

EA isn't really the worst company in America, but it's shocking how every company that wins this award tries to play it off as if it is a joke or undeserved.

I'm so tired of this nonsense. This generation of consoles has brought with it the most insipid, unbelievable nonsense from publishers and developers. Buy used and you can't finish the game? Are you fucking kidding me?

Arseface was my very first thought when seeing that. Glad I'm not the only one.

I find your second point incredibly doubtful. Did you have a conversation, one on one, with the Verizon CEO?(no, you didn't)

Until we see Xcode for (iOS/Windows/Linux), Mac OS isn't going away completely. You need Xcode to create iOS apps, if I recall correctly.

Whatever, man. You're telling me a phone is a comparable browsing experience to a tablet now. That's utter nonsense. A phone is better for reading, or VNC/SSH? For video playback? Just because you might do these things with a phone does not mean they aren't superior on a tablet.

But that's just my point! He's comparing two different products that just happen to have some similar features. By his metric, no TV is worthwhile, because many computer monitors have a better resolution. And that's stupid, no? I'd rather watch TV from my couch on a large 1080p plasma than at my desk on a 27" 2k

AppleCare+, $99. Extends support and defects coverage to two years. Covers up to two accidental damage incidents, with a $50 service fee for each.

I would never buy the 16 GB. I bought a 32 GB original iPad, and it got filled with video fairly quickly. However, I put together a Plex server at home and it streams 1080p video on my home network, which is where I do most of my viewing. If I want to bring something on the road with me, I load it onto the internal

I had a 259 ppi screen in 2005(Nokia N90). I am aware of the fact that Apple didn't invent the concept of higher ppi screens. If you want to go squint at some 4-inch screens when you read, because there's a 10% better ratio of pixels-to-space, have fun.

Higher ppi, but lower color depth and general quality (TFT vs. IPS). Those factors may not increase sharpness, but they do increase the quality of the image beyond what your phone's display is capable of. And, granted, 5 years later we should be able to improve. I've also got a Nexus S with a 235 ppi screen, but the

Obvious troll is obvious. At double the resolution of pretty much everything out there, saying the screen is the same as any other tablet is just untrue.

It really depends on the app. Many interface elements (text, buttons, etc.) are drawn using APIs, not by stamping images on the screen. Games MIGHT take up more space, but it really depends on the game. 3-D games can get a resolution boost without much of a size increase, unless they decide to add higher-res textures.

yep.