They kind of did by unconstitutionally keeping them out of the debates.

Wrong. I’m going to support the current president like a responsible citizen should.

Don’t agree at all. His platform was most importantly lower spending and an end to crony capitalism (pay to play, etc.). Why would their voters vote for Clinton? All the social stuff lines up though....

Not really. No more than a vote for Clinton is voting for Wall Street crony capitalism.

As a libertarian I can say that I was once a Republican, but was turned off by the backwards Jesus-based social policy, warmongering interventionist regime changes and continued running up of debt. And someone else accurately said that the fallacy in this article is that half of Johnson voters would have voted for…

Maybe I just wanted to vote for someone I believe in rather than two candidates that I couldn’t have slept well at night knowing I voted for. Maybe everyone doesn’t share your “Trump is so much worse than Clinton” ideology.

I don’t think the majority who voted for Trump did so because they are racist or misogynist. I think they were sick of a system of crony capitalism that wasn’t working for them. I also don’t think everyone that voted for Hillary was endorsing her criminal behavior either. They liked her larger message.

Yes and people that live in West Virginia and Montana would have absolutely no voice in our Presidential election.

Frankly, I say “FU” to to the people who voted for either of these two as a protest vote against the other. That is even more reprehensible. At least many of the Stein and Johnson voters actually voted for someone they believed in rather than “against” someone. Liberals blaming their loss on them is offensive.

I’ll continue to vote for the Libertarian candidate. I don’t have a preference between Clinton/Trump or Democrats/Republicans - and I am an actual libertarian. So why would I vote for the Dem or Rep - particularly when both candidates are so unappealing?