That’s because it’s boxy like a station wagon, but not bloated like an Explorer.

I’d never put my family in a Town and Country or Caravan. Ever.

Where are you getting your numbers?

I wish that engineers could make engineering decisions instead of politicians.

You’re seriously arguing there’s nothing unfair about not re-attaching the tires to a car before giving it back to the customer? That is really your position here?

Back is fine.  Profile okay.  But the pics won’t show you that hideous front end (on purpose?).

Not that Buick, that Buick.

The person asking about keeping or ditching her boyfriend’s Kia, needs some serious financial counseling. If the cost of replacing a wear item stings, you have absolutely zero business borrowing money to buy a pack of gum, let alone a new car.

Lincoln MKT.
Epic depreciation gets you a low miles loaded 3 row with a pano roof and twin turbo ecoboost. Same bones as Ford’s Flex and Explorer, the Volvo-derived D4 platform.

... which will maybe make your company re-evaluate sending you on all those flights, which is the point. I don’t know about your job, but at mine a lot of the flying people do is for purposes that could pretty easily be done over videoconferencing.

Because the Chinese fastidiously adhere to all international copyright and patent laws...

There has to be some irony in there somewhere:

My first thought. Some masochist put 158,000 miles on this thing.

There’s no penalty for copying in China, even Nikes. 

Wish I got a $9000 bonus for sitting on my ass doing nothing.

This is great.  Now can we hear more about that rumored mid-engine Corvette?

Drive a Navigator and you’ll get it, I promise. 

I like reliability... so I would prefer the Lincoln.

Looking at the Hyundai pictures, you have to ask?