True. However, in this case, I’m rooting for the meteor. The one that crashes through the roof of some rehab facility sometime in the next 6 months or so, and takes them both out.
Sugar-->Power-->Women
sugarpowerwomen
fucking awesome.
Since this is an Anna Merlan story, I guess CASE CLOSED!
*might*
Bad news for Hill. That’s a September speech, not an early-June speech. She’s in trouble.
mmmmm.....three-way
Dude. Thank you for this. You have done us all a great service, and I regret that I have but one star to give.
Perhaps the downside is that it marginalizes Hillary.
I hope he didn’t mean to suggest that they donate the proceeds towards “women’s health issues, or something (else worthwhile)“ because then your bitchy overreaction would be misplaced.
She’s also making sure she maximizes her word count while Gawker can still pay.
731 staffers? Holy shit.
Yesterday, there was much pearl-clutching over Drudge’s use of a Cosby photo with people in the background that implied something or other, apparently. So, just what is Gawker trying to imply with this photo?
Here’s all 10 comments you’ll see here. No need to read any further.
“embattled?”
You’re claiming sexist bullshit over the background of a photo of a man accused by nearly 60 women of sexual assault up to and including rape. Now women can rest easy knowing you’re there to boldly fight unimportant battles from your armchair.
I don’t know....kinda looks like they’re implying Cosby will stand trial for sexual assault, and you’re looking for reasons to be offended.
“Democrats tried to override the veto, but fell short by just five votes.”
You can in Austin! Anywhere a man can go without a shirt, a woman can too.
So, another day, another day everyone gets worked up about nothing.