suekavaty
Sue Kavaty
suekavaty

Trump’s involvement:

The House “impeaches” or indicts. The Senate conducts the “trial.” So, you’re wrong. The Senate does not “impeach.” It conducts a trial on the articles of impeachment presented by the House.

And Sonny Bono.

You might want to read up on the Panama Papers scope, and the involvement (or lack thereof) of Americans. I think you’re playing a dangerous game with your little searches.

I don’t think Christianity has exclusive rights to that particular claim.

Not if he gets impeached. He’d also have to be convicted. [See: Bill Clinton]

He’s already going to ignore the one demanding release of his tax returns.

I think they’ll play him long enough to shove so much legislation down our throats it’ll make it seem like America’s great again. Then they’ll dump him.

We are Americans, and we won’t suffer a tyrant.

First he has to shut down the media—which he’s well on his way to doing on a couple of levels: discrediting them to the public and restricting access to the White House press conferences. Just the beginning . . .

Oh, yes. Yes they do, Cyber Mind Girl. Here’s my proof, straight from the POTUS’ twitter account:

. . . Brexit supporter Nigel Farge this week.

You should print this comment and send it to every Congressperson and every member of the White House staff and all the cabinet members.

Iraq war protests? You’re a baby. I‘m old enough that I can remember the Vietnam war protests, and I know they weren’t as big as today’s Women’s March. (Albeit for a bunch of different reasons.)

But see, those are fake photos taken from fake angles to make the crowd look fakely smaller. And the photos supposedly from 2009? How do we know they were really from 2009?* Or really photos? Couldn’t the crowds have been photoshopped in? Look what the movie industry does with big battle scenes: they take like fifty

Might be my cue to move on from the internet faux-rage crowd.

Most of the country (besides California and New York Democrats) wanted trump.

Agreed. I work for State government. We are told in no uncertain terms, as codified by dozens of rules and policies, that if we use not only any personal accounts but also any personal devices, such as phones, home laptops/pcs, etc., they are subject to confiscation by the State—by virtue of using them for State

“‘cause impeachments/resignations/divorces can happen pretty quick . . . “

To paraphrase Lloyd Bentsen, “I served with Jackie Kennedy. I knew Jackie Kennedy. Jackie Kennedy was a friend of mine. Melania, you’re no Jackie Kennedy.”