“ . . . who are already getting more equality than they deserve.”

Thank you for posting this! I am confident it will build on the foundation of knowledge I obtained from watching QI.

Watch him sue for alimony.

I live in Lincoln, Nebraska—not really known as a hotbed of liberalism, I know. But even I was shocked when I saw a sort of “Dukes of Hazzard” pickup truck with a huge Stars and Bars affixed to the middle of the bed of the truck. Nebraska license plates, too.

a la Clarence Thomas.

I’m from the middle of the country, in a state that is predominately Republican. (I’m a Democrat.) Our governor is an okay guy, our legislature is a Unicameral, so our State senators run under no party affiliation. People are generally kind to and compassionate about one another, no matter what the differences among…

Props department staff = Police training staff? I agree with you—that is an odd connection to make.

Except it wasn’t on his own time. And many of these assaults took place on PSU property in conjunction with PSU-sponsored/supported programs.

I was assaulted in 1974. I can tell you every detail, including conversations with police, my “dorm parents,” my parents. Everything.

Maybe YOUR opinion changes It does NOT, however, change for every man or woman.

I bet they wouldn’t have confiscated my 2001 Ford Focus (although, it is a hatchback, so there’s that . . . )

People ever watched this show? I lasted about 15 minutes and then swore off television completely.

Thank goodness for my ad-blocker app. I don’t see any of that crap.

I know what you mean. I live in a small town with a very loyal fan base for the college football team. Living just a few blocks from the stadium—and on a main route into the campus, I suffer through the same thing every time there’s a home game.

You seem to know way too much about this kind of thing . . . is there anything you’d like to tell us?

• : involving or based on a suggested idea or theory : involving or based on a hypothesis

I would imagine eye-witness testimony would pretty much decide who was the victim and who was the perpetrator. That’s true in all kinds of assault cases—who threw the first punch or whatever. And goodness knows there were plenty of witnesses. I think law enforcement and the judiciary will be able to figure that out.

We’re going to have to agree to disagree on this one. I don’t think the two (or three) are way different, no matter how many “y”s you add to the end of it. I firmly believe (or maybe I just fervently hope) those boys knew it was wrong to watch people having sex in the bathroom. And I think watching a number of boys…

Florida law states “It is legal for a person who is between the age of twenty-three and sixteen (23 - 16) to have consensual sex or engage in sexual activity with a person who is sixteen (16) or seventeen (17) years of age at the time of the sexual activity.”

Sorry—I was responding to your remark that “If she says it’s ok, and she’s not under the influence of drugs or alcohol, what further evidence should be required?”