sue-asponte-to-you
Sue-Asponte-to-you
sue-asponte-to-you

Thanks, I didn’t know that. I’d totally be trying to tuck this into shorts. Blech.

That's what I'm wondering, but it seems odd, because Nike has a ton of different outfits. If this was their only option... yeah, that totally sucks.

And why didn't the players test run it before competition, and choose something else to wear?

Do you have any idea, then, why any women chose to play in the dress? It seems crazy that they never did a test run in it and the first time they tried it was during competition. Were they required by Nike to wear it? I understand that Nike could design a poor product but I don't understand why anyone wore it. Any

What's their favorite kind of cookie to bake for PTA? Are they so grateful when sometimes she handles the morning drop-off?

Yes, plus her contract probably says that too. But she still can sue to say it was motivated by discrimination, instead of a legit reason. In her case it looks like her only protected class is gender, so it seems like a tough row to hoe to show gender discrimination, but who knows.

Yes, a lot of employment law is based on case law, i.e. analyzing the scenarios in past cases and comparing them to the current scenario. So, for example, one incident of a person flaring up with racist behavior isn't likely to lead to justifiable termination (unless it's really egregious). But courts will look at a