suckafree123
suckafree123
suckafree123

I don’t mean move on from literally everything, but if I do have to spell it out: If the pay disparity were suddenly flipped to 15% in women’s favor, it would be in line with the ~10% that I think is the closest disparity in the world (in the other direction; correct me if Sweden or something is like, sub-3).

People really don’t give her the attention they should. I mean she herself usually skips the title, but she has her PhD and is very involved in several issues, especially education.

Jane is an unparalleled liberal bad ass, whose continuous advocacy for human rights doesn’t come with fanfare or a press junket. She does this shit because she wants to.

Erm, Clinton claimed Nancy Reagan started a nationwide conversation about AIDs when noone else would talk about it. That is literally, objectively a lie. That is what is being criticised.

No, this article points out that what Hillary said about Nancy Reagan starting a dialogue on AIDS prevention in America is, in fact, a bald-faced lie. It's not the least bit true in any way, shape, or form. It is the opposite of truth.

I hope she gets hit hard on this by the Sanders camp. Or the media. Or god damn anybody.

Hil seems desperate to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

No, it’s because she thinks she can scoop up some moderate Republican voters in the general election if Trump is the nominee. This is nothing more than dishonest, cynical pandering. Wait, that’s not true. It is something more. It's a flat-out, bald-faced lie.

That doesn’t mean you lie about people and say those who did great damage actually helped. That’s an insult to all who died of AIDS in the 80's and their relatives who lost them. So, that insensitivity and spoken untruth lies squarely on Hillary’s shoulders.

I can’t actually believe this. HRC stans are defending this. I am actually amazed.

is this satire

Wow. You are seriously defending this? There are a MILLION things she could have said about Reagan that are true. ‘Strong first lady, amazing courage during her husband’s assassination attempt’ and she went for this. How do you think you are progressive and spout this kind of stuff?

Has HRC ever done anything wrong in

I agree she has hustle; hell, I even believe she has “it.” What she doesn’t have is much talent to go with “it,” which is a weird position to be in. Her talent is in figuring out how to get people to want to watch and listen to her even though her acting and singing aren’t so hot. That, coupled with beauty, has gotten

Whoa, what was that? Beyonce has talent and a career, Katy has a career. Jennifer...well, Jennifer is there.

Bwahahahahahahahaha. HIS. OWN. KID.

One group that came out big for Bernie was men.

Really? My liberal feminist boyfriend voted for Bernie in the primaries (as did I) and he has no issues what so ever with the president’s genitals. Which is one of the reasons why he’s my boyfriend. That and he makes a mean pan of brownies.

Are you deliberately trying to make Clinton supporters look awful like TomatoFace does, or are you just accidentally doing it?

Not that those people aren’t totally repulsive, but don’t mistake a few loud people on the internet as being representative of the actual voters. I’m a millennial too, and there’s nothing I hate more than people who think millennials are stupid, lazy, spoiled, entitled, and so on. We’re the ones who got screwed over

Counterpoint: In the same article where he ate his humble pie, Enten pointed out that you have to go back to a primary in 1984 to find an example of even one individual state where polling was this far off.