Right. If I can afford an ICBM then why shouldn’t I be able to have one?

Can we go back to the 80's?

It looks better in the camo because it obscures the ‘styling’.

Anything with a Mitsubishi logo on it should be avoided.

IIRC the last generation Toyota MR2 (MRS) had all bolt on body panels.

I still want to know what the added noise is going to be. I vote for the Jetsons car noise.

Am I the only one seeing the front fascia styling looking like a muted version of the Lexus design disaster?

Red Sport 400 sounds like a name a 7 year old kid would make up.

The four-door only Moab Edition starts at $52,695 with destination, and is already rolling out to dealers.

I’m fond of “tits”.

We will later find out that the car was driving and the owner was in the back seat taking a nap. Stupid reckless car; messed up my nap.

It’s a niche car that helps to attenuate the blandness of all the cookie cutter crossovers under the brand. It is also an attainable priced blank canvass type of car that enthusiasts gravitate towards.

FWIW - I have posted before that I like the Juke. It isn’t something that I would want for myself, but I do like it. My being pissed at Nissan for the tease and denial with the IDX has nothing to do with me liking or not liking the Juke. I’m just pissed at Nissan.

It’s ok.

Introducing the new Nissan Juke. It’s good. 

In most cases I would agree, but I believe the IDX at a Miata price point would have been a decent seller.

1st Gear: Please Stop Tweeting

And it will be a ‘crossover’ that is only available with FWD and a CVT.

Sure, we can have a new version of the Juke, but no IDX. Screw you, Nissan.

That little 1.8 was over-square, too, so the bore diameter was wider than the stroke length.