No kidding. Dude, what you described is sexual assault, so no, that’d be a crime. Do not pass go, do not collect $200. Like, oh I saw your derp face out and about and it was punchable, so I punched it. What could I do? NOT PUNCH YOU?? Never.

Oh my god, right? I love the part where Baldasaro starts off with ‘no disrespect’ but can’t even spell her name right (Amanada), and then proceeds to say several very disrespectful things (your nipple would be the last one I would want to see). Also, if a woman is on the beach topless, you don’t have to look at her…

I fully support a woman’s right to slug a man in public who attempts to grab her nipples without her explicit or implicit permission, and simply having them bare is not, as these reps have suggested, implicit permission .

Really you’re more shocked by the grammar? He’s saying if women are allowed to breastfeed in public then men should be able to sexually assault women in public. Like I understand this is Jez and snarking on grammar is usually a good way to blow off steam, but what he said is beyond the pale.

It’s actually a dogwhistle of a threat. Women get too much freedom and the consequences are naturally sexual assault from men. And it’s all the women’s fault for expecting too much.

This man is a potential rapist and that was a very threatening tweet.

I know, I was astounded by that comment!! What the hell? Who thinks that is an appropriate thing to say to anyone. Also, yeah, you don’t have more respect for women if that’s what you think is reasonable. And I don’t need you to “protect [my] innocence,” thank you very much. I want you to keep your fucking hands to…

He’s not just defending men’s ‘right’ to stare with “boys will be boys,” but actually supporting men’s “inclantion” to grab a woman’s nipple in public.

Hey if you women have a nipple out then men are allowed to grab it kind of like if you’re just showing your wallet off—I mean

Honestly, I’m more shocked by the atrocious spelling and grammar than by the actual content of the tweets. That they are dangerously aggressive loose canons comes as less of a surprise.

Right?

“Women care about basically the same things men care about—health care....”

He committed a sex crime against a woman. But fuck it, let’s just prioritize the feelings of men over the women they harass some more:)

Because we need to find the man and get him off the streets and hopefully into some caretaking facility. Yes, there is a likelihood he’s not mentally well, however what he did is not ok. What of the victim? Or of his future victims? Is her/their mental health not worthy of care?

I grew up in the burbs. Once, while waiting for my sister to get out of a community art class, I saw a man drive up next to me and start jerking off. There are no guarantees in life.

Because he’s committing a crime, so the fact that some person on the Internet has diagnosed him with mental illness doesn’t really matter?

At the same time, he pissed and moaned about the four-hour RNC debate, even claiming his ability to stand up for that long was some kind of record.

I’m confused as to why this pee break thing is such a big deal. Is there a big advantage to having a president who wasn't late getting back from the bathroom that one time? Maybe Trump stores his urine in his hair and only has to pee once a week. I guess that would be helpful.

Leaving is when abusers pull out all the stops: manipulation, destroying self esteem any way possible, worse violence than ever. Quietly make a plan and go, at least temporarily, where they won’t find you, like a shelter or out of town. Cover your tracks: they will try to get information out of anyone they can,…

“Why don’t you fight back?” they say. “Why don’t you leave?” they say. This is why.