studiotodd--disqus
StudioTodd
studiotodd--disqus

I now basically come to the AVClub only to laugh at how many people claim to hate TWD, yet still comment by the thousands week after week.

The book that the movie was based on was excellent as well—terrifying and it delved much deeper into the inner dialogue, motivations and strange dependency that Corky develops with Fats. It was written by William Goldman, who also wrote screenplays for many memorable movies, including Butch Cassidy and the Sundance

My favorite thing in the whole episode—Kristen Schaal upon discovering that it was blood, after all.

Peggy Ann Snow

Is he being petty, though? Cameron and Joe did actually have sex at Comdex behind Tom's back. His suspicions are correct and Cam is lying to his face.

Dear Arrow Show,

I'm very excited. Can't wait. Haters back off.

The "mockumentary"-style is completely inconsistent, though. They toss it out at their convenience. No TV documentary show (especially this genre) I've ever seen would use the type of elaborate shots seen in this episode.

It's not too early to tell…it's AHS and Ryan Murphy. Shitty TV is sure to follow.

I meant in the sense that he doesn't want to go through his insurance…back then, that was a touchy proposition. He could have easily been dropped by his insurance and flagged as a risk for any other carriers.

He would if he wanted it to be anonymous.

Yeah, I don't quite get it. Is Donna a partner or an employee? Why does Cameron get final say on every decision?

About that test result: they got the timing about right—if he had gone in the day after he spoke with the guy who visited him, it would have been about 5 days later for the results to come back.

And Cameron dumping on him felt a little out of place too.

I kind of get the feeling they may be headed towards mirroring the Donna/Cameron relationship with Ryan and Joe in an attempt to rehabilitate Joe's character and make him less detestable.

Like I've said elsewhere, I used to log in to the site after almost every show I watched. Now, I come by maybe once or twice a week. You would never have seen links for the same show's reviews from two different weeks on the homepage before, but now it happens all the time.

Does anyone know the reason behind this downsizing bullshit? Are they just going bankrupt and can't afford to pay writers anymore, or is there some kind of relaunch or some other "genius" plan in the works?

"Stay tuned."

Like I said, terrifying and infuriating.

That case perfectly illustrates my point. A man has been killed for a crime that may not have even occurred, based on "cherry-picked" evidence and questionable testimony from dubious "experts." But, at least the prosecutor didn't lose his case. That's the most important thing, right?