It would seem you write shit for clicks and know nothing of engineering.

if it can’t be made fun of then what can?

Ruben Tejada were seriously hurt by technically legal slides

Title to my autobiography. Or anyone’s really.

Chukwudiebere Maduabum

Would you describe it as feeling like a date rejection or professional qualifications rejection?

My hobby is wasting time reading y’alls work. I enjoy it.

Does it get you free tickets to the games with a media pass? I’ll write a useless fluff piece or blurb if it gets me in free.

Excellent points. I am in no way a journalist so I just thought I would ask! Thanks for the replies!

You may have mentioned this before in some old writings, but do you all ever apply for media passes or have y’all already been banned or blacklisted from a lot of places based on your criticisms of leagues and general content of the website?

Yeah, I don’t doubt it was true. Kawhi is the guy that will go to work sick as can be and the boss has to tell him to go home.

Green got burned so bad.

I don’t think his stuff has a comment section. I think it’s called “Safe zone pseudo-journalism”

I am not really sure if you’re serious about the first part of your statement. As its quite obvious that Shaun King did not do anywhere near as thorough a job as Diana did. He’s written 2 pieces on this topic and still provides no additional background to any of the story all while Diana, on Deadspin with presumably…

Never said Peyton was not guilty. He may have done exactly what she said or even worse. What the dispute was about was that Mr. King did not provide any additional sources or context to what he wrote based on one document alone. He based everything he wrote on one document that, if he did any research at all, would…

I didn’t know who he was until someone else here on DS got their knickers in a twist that DS had not reported on King’s reporting yesterday. Diana’s cross-referencing multiple cases sheds light on the information from the “facts of the Case” court filing. The “facts of the case” filing is, as Diana states:

I did read it. He doubles down on his claims without providing anything of substance that wasn’t already listed in the 74 page filing. Diana actually did! How hard could it be?

Yes. His other work is irrelevant to this particular topic, though. He did absolutely no research, but Diana did. He took the court filing, that is designed to compel a judge to allow the trial to move forward, as 100% fact. Anyone who has a computer could have googled, “what is an opposition to summary judgement” and…

So much more in depth than Shaun King’s piece. It’s like you actually did what a journalist is supposed to do. Mr. King is probably envious of your abilities.

You’ll be happy to see that the person i suggested you contact in the first place wrote a piece about it. A piece where she acknowledges that King’s NYDN piece was dependent on a one sided filingcalled, “Facts of the Case.”