No, not necessarily, but for the sake of women's sports, it could be. When the NCAA goes away and student athletes can be paid, the lawyers will reference the above stated case and either eliminate womens sports or not pay them as much or anything at all. The case I referenced says women can be paid less because their…

I would pay $10,000,000,000,000 that I dont have to see someone say, "and who the fuck are you?" to this lady... what is she famous for? instagram pictures? thats ridiciulous someone can be famous for posting pictures.

I'm sure that's a great joke... but I suppose it takes someone whos is on the internet 24/7 to understand. Stanley v USC is a huge precedent and was a serious comment, go read the legal brief and you will find how the ruling was written, "men's sports require more skill, time and effort than women's sports." That is…

Stanley v. University of Southern California is the only precedent you need to know and then you will hate that Title IX exists.

How on earth is Dazed and Confused not #1? You know writing about movies all the time keeps you from really enjoying a movie. What you're really saying is, I'm putting in my subjective opinion which goes against the collective overwhelming number of subjective opinions (which make it the right answer) that say Dazed…

Don't have to. The first three links do the work for me. The NWLC is an extremely feminist group that attacks anyone they deem a threat. They personally attack people. Their research is biased. The NCAA is the second link. The NCAA finds it in their best interest to have research that shows "women good, we do good,…

Biased article using biased sources.

If that is the case, I want 24 scholarships for my Harry Potter Quidditch Team. Its twice the roster size of Women's basketball and would probably draw more spectators!

Essentially you are saying they have to provide a 12-15 women basketball team with everything they need, because it serves the students? What students…

That article is so biased and uses biased sources.

So the logical conclusion of this is that all countries drop out and then the IOC has to pay a city to host the Olympics.

see my reply to FightingJoeBucks chile v brazil shootout

The Chile Brazil Shootout... Arauganiz(spelling) kicked that rocket that left Julio Cesar stuck, Macca had nothing but a sound effect. I wish I could find the ESPN broadcast of it. Its all highlights that I can find. Agree though that he does have a snobbishness to him but what color commentator doesn't?

Was it the fact Portugal has the ability to score 30 in a game and revewrse the goal differential or the fact you were watching the US v Ghana game 12 days too late? We needed Ghana to score. You read deadspin... thecharts were up. Darke is great.

I would agree. Twellman has some good commentary, like the article said, but I think Darke is so articulate that takes a lot to keep up with him. Maybe with some practice Twellman can get there. Darke and Macca cant be beat, Macca isn't great but he's open and honest about what he sees and feeds easily off of Darke,…

I'm going to throw this idea out:

serious question before i google and listen to these guys... are those bands (iration and tribal seeds) legit reggae?

I do that when I am stuck visiting relatives. Fire up the rental car, stock up on beer and tacos and find a place to be fucking lazy. How is that douchey?

Cameron has had 3 big fuck ups! 3 fuck ups/2 games = 3 goals. Thats Geoff Cameron math. at which rate we are looking at ... one moment... 17-0 Germany over USA if he isnt benched.

I will give you the laziness but I raise you lack of skill on Geoff Cameron's part. A baby could play better defense than Cameron. Holy Shit Cameron sucks balls. How he even plays in the Premier League is a mystery.

Agreed, however, Cameron on the back line during the Ronaldo break slowed up his run in the box allowing the ball to be headed in. Cameron has allowed all 3 goals. Cameron has failed 3 times. A central defender can not play like that. He needs to be benched.