So you're saying you want women to get custody because of their gender, and not base it on what is best for their children.

I say: "That means not assuming a woman is a better caregiver than her husband"

Why am I speaking in absolutes?

"women would still get primary custody" Citation needed.

Twitter is great for those "I'm bothered by this, but not bothered enough to spend 15-30 minutes navigating phone menus and trying to find the right department/person to talk to" complaints. Like, if something comes of it, great; if nothing does, oh well.

AND with the addition of the personalized, hand-made watercolor picture, ridiculously thoughtful. I, too, am impressed.

What? No.

It's not a matter of what some women "prefer" - it's a stereotype, and the feminist movement wants to make women and men viewed as caregivers based on their individual capabilities and qualifications, not "well, that one has boobs and milk comes from boobs."

Haha, I totally use a phonebook. I recently moved to a fairly podunk little town and most of the businesses here have never heard of making a website. It's weird!

Kat,

Er... hi. I am an individual, not a movement. I am a human that doesn't like being called by my gender, assumed or otherwise, by strangers on the internet - mostly because it indicates condescension!

Slang is often rude!

The more you know. Regardless, kinda rude to just address someone by what you assume their gender is, especially the juvenile version of the term.

Mm, I'm not the person you're addressing, but... people dislike MRAs because they make everything about themselves. Just look at the world around you: the majority of politicians, business leaders, judges, etc are all men, there's a history of stigmatizing femininity, etc. Basically, everything kind of is already…

omg you're a treasure

1) My username has "sarah" in it and that has never been a unisex name. It's ok to assume.

Boy?

"Non-blacks are inferior musically"

Whoops, I mean *isn't. Remember when you could edit posts on kinja? Those were the days.

But the photographer is just "taking pictures of people" - he is specifically seeking out women. If it were a site devoted to everyone who eats on their commute and poking fun at them, fine, it's just a silly website. It becomes a "gender issue" when the critical eye is turned only on women (when EVERYONE does this!).