No, that won’t work.

“including some of the things she was going through at the time.”

The Steele treatment *is* the party line for minorities and women.

I don’t think anything sums up the internet in the early 00's than: “Everyday We Stray Further From God’s Light”.

That’s fair. Me, I think of it this way:

I mean, fair enough.

... Problematic for *who*?

I’d mostly just call them reaching out to you them having game.

“No there “aren’t”.”

The folks with game asked the waitress for her number, and got it.

You don’t discuss feeling a draft when the house is on fire.

They’re going to give police officers greater reason to harass black men. Men who already have good reason not to like police officers, good reason not to trust police officers, and good reason to be scared of police officers.

A reform of how cops investigate is warrented, to be sure. Swatting should not be murder - it should be a police check-in, and nothing more. However:

No, people absolutely do say that. Those are people who advocate a toxic view of masculinity.

It gets associated with men because half of society has always taught that you are not a man unless that is how you conduct yourself.

Because they got to say something that meant “n*****r” without actually saying it.

Why? Why don’t we just... You know, call it what it is?

It’s not. But it is “masculine” nonethless.

“those who are not with me are against me and if you’re against me you will be dealt with.”

I appreciate your perspective. I have a different one, but let’s be real: none of our opinions will matter these kids, and rightly so.