Correct, you can’t remove the firearm from the premises. By your own admission, it sounds to me then like it’s much easier to do harm with a rented van than a rented firearm, wouldn’t you say? Despite all the obstacles you mentioned Re: renting a van, it’s still FAR easier to do all those things than to lawfully…
Stormin-Norman
stormin-norman
You can rent a handgun at a shooting range. You need two forms of ID and you can’t remove it from the premises. My point being that it’s much easier to do harm with a rental car (Which ANYONE can get - as we said, license and insurance) than a firearm that requires a detailed background check (and various other…
As you so eloquently put it: He said a naughty word.
Clearly. We’re all without sin here.
Well, I appreciate the honestly; it’s rare to see that on this platform. Ultimately, I disagree, but a civilized conversation is welcome
A van costs $19.99 at my local Uhaul for 30 minutes - the Barcelona van was a rental. Last time I checked, all handgun sales through an FFL in Florida require that paperwork is maintained for inspection. Private sales operate under the assumption that the original owner is still responsible for the firearm; that’s why…
“Larson is clearly a talented young man, but has he learned his lesson? According to NASCAR he has”
That’s never stopped this site before...
You didn’t per-se; it was the responses to your original comment that did. However, I believe my comment is still relevant given your second comment contained this this statement: “if half of your country can shrug in the face of mass murder...” What do you propose the solution is? Banning ALL guns?
They really are. People don’t understand just how little was done to those cars to send them to the US. The fact that the volume knob is on the right side (USA Passenger) of the factory Blaupunkt is just one of the many giveaways; same with the parking brake location
Well said. I do want to address that last paragraph though. Ultimately, yes...drones are the future of warfare, and there’s very little that man can do to combat the effectiveness of a drone. However, no matter how technologically advanced we become, you’ll always need a physical person to go make the arrest or knock…
Clearly, so by the OP’s logic, we should shut this all down because clearly freedom of speech shouldn’t apply here.
No, clearly he’s not sure about that. He’s just spewing shit from the keyboard. As you correctly pointed out, the tech was already well established.
That’s a common misconception. Let’s put an end to that.
Well, it’s funny you say that. It’s not a judge’s position to create legislation; a judge merely interprets. If the Constitution needs to change, then the method to do so is well defined, as you pointed out.
Original comment: “..this isn’t as bad as the bill that just passed in VA that prevents police from pulling people over for not having their lights on at night.”
Oh, I don’t know...maybe prevent the loss of innocent lives due to careless motorists who are 0% at fault for the ensuing collision?
SEE?!?! She’s NOT a racist. She loves cheating on her husband with black people!