I don’t think I’ve ever heard a feminist defend Islamic oppression of women as a religious right. Way to make fun of feminism and hippies though! Haha those femnazis and dirty damn hippies sure have stupid ideas, don’t they?! Boy, you got them good!
I don’t think I’ve ever heard a feminist defend Islamic oppression of women as a religious right. Way to make fun of feminism and hippies though! Haha those femnazis and dirty damn hippies sure have stupid ideas, don’t they?! Boy, you got them good!
The only person here with their head up their ass is you.
I have literally never heard of any feminist saying that. The closest thing to that is when they defend a Muslim woman’s right to wear a hijab if she wants to.
It’s patronizing that he thinks she needs to consult anyone, much less someone who agrees with her, and it's double patronizing to come from him.
See: New Deal, The
It’s specifically because he told her to consult her husband that it’s patronizing.
Whoa, calm down toots. Have a sedative.
Why does she have to be so bitchy? He was only trying to help. If she doesn’t think her husband is smart, why did she marry him? And why did she have to show off how smart she is in her reply? She must be super insecure, to have to use all those complicated concepts I don’t understand. Women are so emotional... /s
It’s the women part that really gets them.
And the difference between Scott Walker and that five year old is that mailboxes actually are cool.
Posner may be a conservative, but he’s an honest judge. That’s almost a damn miracle these days. He’s very smart and he tries to decide cases on their legal merits, and lays it all out without holding anything back. I respect that a lot.
How does it feel to spew misinformation in the name of your ideology?Does it make you feel powerful or something? You’re not even sort of maybe correct, you’re just lying.
No, but the clinics cannot have a contractual transfer agreement with a public hospital and they cannot operate without a contractual transfer agreement with a hospital.
Any reasoning they can pull out of their ass to block access is good enough.
They’re targeted ONLY at abortion clinics. Similar measures aren’t required for other outpatient clinics taht do invasive procedures. It’s total bullshit trying to do an end run and Roe.
But that’s the goal, right? drain the state coffers through pointless court battles, then tell the people there’s no money for social programs. Americans will never vote to end medicare or social security. This is how they’re putting those programs in the crosshairs.
With the ASC standards and admitting privileges should come a buffer zone for clinics. How are the doctors going to rush those women to a hospital if those protesters are outside?
Admitting privileges for abortion providers is a messed up concept, because usually doctors need to agree that they admit X number of patients a year. Since the complication rates for abortions are SO LOW, most providers don’t qualify. So, it’s like we’re punishing abortion providers for, um, helping women safely and…
STOP WASTING TAXPAYER MONEY ON GODDAMN BULLSHIT THAT’S JUST GOING TO GET STRUCK DOWN ANYWAYS.