It's too difficult to read the comments so sorry if someone else has already suggested this, but if possible 1) get enzyme spray and saturate the area; 2) block off the cat's access to it for as long as possible to let it fully dry (a couple of days at least); 3) put the litter box there; 4) move the litter box away…

I know it has been corrected once (I can't find the correction comment now or I'd just reply there) so sorry for being pedantic, but out of the terms provided by the first commenter the one you'd want to use is Aboriginal. The Aboriginal peoples of Canada include First Nations, Inuit, and Metis individuals and is the…

That was awesome. I had no idea, and it's amazing. Thanks for sharing that!

My poor grandma has spent the last 36 years trying to get my siblings and me to call her "Grams" instead of "Grandma" or, her most hated, "Granny." She has signed every card and every present "Grams." Despite that, we've always called her granny or grandma. It wasn't even until a few years ago that I realized that…

I echo the comment about REALLY needing to soak the carpet in the enzymatic stuff. And then try to block off access to the area until it's super dry. It's the only thing that worked when my cat was freaking out and urinating in the corner due to a mean outdoor neighbourhood cat who would come to our window and, I…

My pit has never done that, but she is a champion cuddler. Aw, cuddly lawyer!

Two of my friends have that kind of metabolism. Both of them eat a tonne—and a tonne of desserts/candy—and don't work out at all and are really thin but also curvy.

On my phone (and in the past), there were numerous featured comments; on one article I read this morning, there were 5 comment streams featured. Not to mention that here, comment threads can branch off of that "featured" comment so I would have to click to see everything. But my point was more that I read beyond…

I agree. I think the design of this system is flawed in numerous ways, but it's the idea that it promotes discussion and makes it more cohesive with articles that I find outrageous. Without that ideal, it's just a system that doesn't make sense to me. With that ideal, it's laughable. This is only anecdotal, of…

This is my own bias because it's what I do for a living, but you assert that the "average reader" isn't going to scroll through 100+ comments. While, sure, maybe that makes some sense, do you have any data on this? Have you done any consultations with readers?