stillburnswhenipost
stillburnswhenipost
stillburnswhenipost

In a perfect world, yes. In the real world, no.

Sometimes it’s not worth it to explain things like this.

Almost...I think you may be on to something.

You’re asking for too much.

How old is your son?

Cognitive dissonance is a bitch, my friend.

I was mad at the NFL, but William Gay’s demeanor about it by turning it into a means of raising awareness has pacified me. Good man.

It’s implied racism and sexism really. The structure of the title is to make someone initially think “this man just dominated this woman’s choices” In google searches it can attract a greater group of people if you know the dynamic of the relationship.

She didn’t give up her family to marry him. Her family excommunicated her because she was marrying him. The title of this article is misleading and can make someone think that Gene Upshaw was the force that made her choose between him and her family. Which would lead one to believe that you’re playing upon racism for

I said the “essence” of innovation. What you described is a new process, but essentially the old process of releasing a product and having those additions appear in future models towards being something outsourced to a community before it exists. It still begins with a person or persons coming up with a product that

Not really. It’s just simple, think about something that doesn’t exist yet that people can’t live without. It’s the very essence of innovation.