stickytape0505
StickyTape0505
stickytape0505

You're right that the issue is one of religion, however you aren't going to change a 2000 year old religion. You can however, change how companies handle the beliefs of their owners versus the rights of their employees to do whatever they see fit in terms of their healthcare.

The point is religions tend to be patriarchal. You aren't going to change a 2000+ year old religion, so you need to change the way the law handles the issue of religious belief vs. governmental rights for a person.

I'm not suggesting punishment was unwarranted, I just think that if you're complaining and complaining that he should be punished, to me it's a little douche-y to then come out and say "Oh come on THAT'S too much"

I disagree. I think he looks like kind of a tool. He whines about being bitten, then when they sanction Suarez he's all "Oh no that was so harsh, I can't believe they did that".

Healthcare companies also find reasons to not cover many medications (medicinal marijuana for example, I remember a HuffPost article about it some time ago).

They all come in the "Christian extremist starter bundle"

Being Christian doesn't mean you aren't allowed to make a living and must live for charity. I disagree with the ruling, but still, that's a little far.

How about you don't look to movies to teach you life lessons at all, because movies would be incredibly boring if they emulated life to the letter.

I don't think it's accurate to refer to abortion as popular or revered. That's like saying "Boy removing the gallbladder is certainly revered here in the states".

My only problem with saying it's Gohan, or Gohan's grandchild or whatever, is this. What purpose would him being there serve? Story-wise, it would probably be some weak reason to have Gohan come into a time period he already lived through.

I think this blatant objectification of men is intolerable. It's creating a body image most men can't hope to achieve as most of us aren't professional athletes training for hours every day.

It's only dangerous if you're an idiot. If you meet during the day in a populated, open place, it's the same level of danger as anything else.

As a guy I don't really like Googling people I meet online. I prefer to get to know someone in person rather than go in knowing a bunch about them already. I think part of why people have a hard time connecting is that there is so much about you online now that you never sit, look someone in the eye and talk to them

People are actually giving money to this guy because they think he's so attractive?

Their defense would still be laughable. And in my opinion it's wishful thinking to say that Melo would fit into the offense. The ball tends to stick when he's around.

Where the can then be operated on against their will.

Unfortunately the victim always has to be looked at. That's just the way it works. If there is no way to definitively prove innocence, the only other course of action is to prove the claim has no standing, which often means digging around for way to make the jury see the victim as "the alleged victim".

Exactly. And these are all hyper competitive alpha males who will gladly mortgage their twilight years for glory.

It's not just the sideline test. Players have been known to take Ritalin to boost their mental functioning to make sure they pass concussion tests BETWEEN games.

How has no one said a Pokemon RPG like the gameboy versions of the game? I don't own a WiiU but I would go out TODAY and buy one if I knew that was in the works.