And I don't suppose Kotaku are going to bother reporting about the female GG-supporter that got basically the same threat several weeks ago?
How about the other numerous doxxings that GGers have gone through?

This happens all the time to both men and women. And not only in gaming industry mind you. You become publicly known person, you'll get these. It's sick.

Ah the old exposure line rears its head. When have you ever heard of a doctor or plumber doing work for exposure...

But are you guys transparent? It troubles me that questions about conflicts of interest caught you guys so off guard that Stephen had to show up and tell everyone about the changes being made. Changes that, to be honest I thought you guys already followed.

To allow a discussion without being censored. The fact that Luke's last article was prefaced by "I will be moderating the shit out of this thread" proves that you all don't want to have an actual discussion.

This whole situation is sad for me. Kotaku is my favourite journalism site, and I aligned with what Zoe was for. However after this I don't know how much I can trust Kotaku any more. Of course you'll publicly state that everything is fine, that's your line you have to tow it. Grayson appears to still be there and my…

Yes, he's covered stories related to her. The allegation is that he did so while sleeping with her, which is a conflict of interest.

Really, did you try to do that? She has faked harassment, exploited the depressed, engaged in misogyny and now you defend her right to do it with nothing more than the flimsy pretext of "slutshaming."

Bullshit. He wrote more than one article about her. Only one of them was at Kotaku though. He wrote at extensively Rock, Paper, Shotgun about her. Why believe lies from people that have something to hide. There is more to this than just sex.

Well great, this totally removed my inclination to buy the original...

Good thing I did not buy the GOTY Edition, seeing as they still release DLC after the Edition that usually includes all the DLC

I've got both (well, the OLED is the missus's, technically), and I love my cheap piece of plastic. It's just a tad lighter but you feel it on the long run: that thing is really comfy. Agreed, the colors are not as saturated, the contrast is not as deep, but all in all, that doesn't make it a bad screen. If you throw…

I actually love the aesthetics of the redesign. However that OLED on the original was beautiful enough for me to get the device despite my only really playing Persona 4 Golden and the imported PSO2 (which are cool but I probably would have held off if I didn't read this site and see that the original OLED version…

I couldn't give 3 baby diarrhea's.

I'll give you something: No Layton games (really, one would have done), no castlevania, and no Horror genre games (dementium the ward was pretty good).

Why do people act like they'll never see Monster Hunter on the Vita? Um, Monster Hunter IS coming to the Vita. Sure, it's an express version of the MMO, but it could be a gateway. Will we see it here in the US, though?

@Luke Plunkett: Why? That's a question I'm asking myself. Probably out of a vain hope that you guys would get better, but you're only getting worse. And when I say this, I know I'm not overreacting.

@Luke Plunkett: Whoop-de-doo, Plunkett. Perhaps I'm overreacting, but then again, I'm frustrated at the hilariously awful downward spiral that Kotaku articles in general has been taking. It's been especially noticeable in the past few months.

By the same token, I shouldn't trust Kotaku's coverage or reviews of Dante's Inferno given the amount of cash EA threw at Gawker to plaster the site with idiotic advertising. Why should I trust one word anyone on this site wrote about that game given that advertising was everywhere for it?