It wasn’t “performance-enhancing stimulants”. It’s called, “studying, knowing what the fuck you’re doing and getting proper rest by not staying up until 3:00 in the morning tweeting like a dumbass.”

Trump will next criticize Clinton’s ill-fitting suits, her inexplicably orange skin, her tendency to loom over people, and her terrible comb-over. “I hear she just reaches out and grabs people by the pussy, is what I hear” reports Trump.

I’d feel more sympathy for Monica if she hadn’t gone to DC with an admitted and already established pattern of pursuing married men.

Get the word feminist outta your mouth, fool. You’ve made like, eight attempts to argue that the wife of a cad is more offensive to sexual assault victims than a guy who brags about sexually assaulting people, and they’re getting worse each try.

I can both believe his victims and also think that his wife shouldn’t be held responsible for his actions, because I am an intelligent human capable of nuanced thoughts.

I find it difficult to criticize Hillary for being human. I don’t know if anyone could weather probably the most core shaking experience in a marriage in the public eye without making some missteps or acting foolishly. I have other issues with her being a Washington Insider but to criticize her for how she handled her…

And isn’t it wonderful how Trump wants to dismiss his 11 year old footage and then counters by reaching back 25 years to accuse Bill Clinton of.... allegations made during a witch hunt that people already know about and were ultimately fruitless and were a huge waste of taxpayer money and derailed the smooth operation…

The problem is the lack of evidence beyond simple testimony. There is no pattern and all three are connected to the wingnutosphere. The cases were investigated and found lacking. All three cases because of their connection to his ideological foes and lack of evidence beyond testimony looked like smears rather than…

The bimbo eruptions were about consensual sex. The three I referenced were cases that were thoroughly investigated by Ken Starr and lacked evidence beyond the women’s assertions. The women also had connections to Clinton’s ideological foes. To see the two as similar is at best disingenuous. 

Yes, privately referring to a few women who consensually had sex with your husband as “bimbos” is totally just as heinous a crime as, you know, those actual crimes of sexual assault that Trump privately bragged about that certainly seem to be very true. I mean, if you are a moron and are trying to defend a creepy…

I absolutely believe that Bill Clinton is, at the very least, predatory towards vulnerable women. His consensual affair with Monica Lewinsky is proof of that. But you’re missing a big chunk of nuance here. It’s not about hypocrisy, it’s about false equivalency.

I love how internet white knights like you are in a bind here. Supporting Hillary=supporting Bill and his abuse of women.

Trump says we aren’t supposed to bring up things that happened decades ago when it comes to sexual assault.

Really weird how Trump will say, in 2 consecutive sentences: “How dare you bring up something that happened way back in 2005?” and“Why aren’t you attacking Bill Clinton for something that happened in 1979?”