I used to play a lot of games...

And this is a dumb and uninformed reaction to my statement. lol

It’s really a bummer to see Nintendo doing this in a main, flagship title.

Not the part about paying for additional content. That’s cool and any gamers that feel they’re entitled to continuous content post release of a completed game are delusional.

What bums me out about this is that they’re going with the “Season…

Some of us don’t own a PS4 or Xbox One because of these reasons. As someone who is not exactly cup runeth over with cash, the idea of my Zelda experience being diminished by not buying DLC kinda sucks. Is it within their right to do something other game companies have done and gotten away with? Sure. They’re a…

Why is embracing DLC a positive thing? If they deemed that any of these upcoming features were legit enough, the features would of been alotted development time to get it in on release. Plain and simple.

Hot take:

Really loving the hypocricy in the comment section. Anyone else but Nintendo does this, there would be a cry for blood. Nintendo does it, yeah, it’s super ok, they’re totally doing it right.

Wait WHAT?!?!?!

They’ve just told you there will be a whole story you don’t get if you don’t shell out a third more than the game is supposed to cost.

This makes me more sad then it needs to. Next thing you’ll know Nintendo goes all Assasins Creed and locks vital story segments behind dlc. And Nintendo was supposed to be the last bastion of complete games on release. Don’t do this Nintendo, you’ve been in the clear for so long now.

This feels like that scene in the Godfather where he wakes up with the horse head in his bed, except it’s Link and the horse’s head is Epona’s.

“Hey guys, did you see what Ubisoft is doing?” - Nintendo 2017