It's not just made up, it's completely ridiculous. European law makes it impossible. Muslims have been in Europe for longer than America has existed but have shown no inclination to try to impose religious law. And the idea that people would leave Muslim-majority countries to try and set up a theocracy in a part of…

"So… you're saying that he's an evil genius who has cracked the code for undefeatable arguments?"

Here's a knotty little problem for you.

To be fair, I doubt they thought about it that hard.

Do you speak in anything other than clichés?

"i did agree with him on more than i expected."

End of the day, if you want deep analysis, you're in the wrong place. You say yourself that there are plenty of examples of what the piece describes so… what's the problem? Do you object to someone leaving people to do their own research? Or is it wrong for any journalist to take it as read that people know who the…

He's not just unfunny. He also thinks he IS funny. I've seen various clips where he has tried to shut people down with what he thinks is a pithy rejoinder, but isn't capable of doing it so just comes off like an angry Bill O'Reilly type who forgot to hire any goons.

This is the worst part of it, I think. If they invited an actual fascist, who would earnestly and honestly defend his views as he has always stated them, that would have some merit as broadcasting.

Today's phrase is "Regressive Left".

Or, just possibly, people have heard enough from him and don't need to hear any more.

"Identity politics" in this case is a bizarre caricature of what right-wing people think left-wing politics is. They then do exactly what they claim to be opposing "ironically" - meaning that they're actually the only ones doing it.

"Really don't understand the media hysteria over Milo. He's explicitly not a White nationalist. He's never used Nazi imagery. He's a fairly generic conservative. Probably a little bit racist but no more than any mainstream Republican commentator."

It makes total sense in the headspace of Internet Moral Relativism.

The "flow" you're going with appears to be gastric.

And Wikileaks did that one arguably good thing years ago and has been trying to use it to wriggle out of responsibility for some pretty dodgy things since.

On the upside, there is a slow but steady trickle of people having the Soylent Green-style revelation that … Bill Maher IS Milo!

In decades to come, he will be stuffed and mounted in a museum as part of the "Where Liberalism Went Really Fucking Wrong For A While" exhibit.

To those who insist that we just want to shut down anyone we don't agree with because we don't want Milo Yiannapolous on TV nationwide…

Quite. You can criticise a religion, and you can judge people by their actions. Those who seek to attack someone through their religion can bugger off.