She looks more like Shirley Phelps every day, imo.

If Trump fired him he would just hand him another piece of paper to sign without reading that would unfire him again.

End of the day, it's not worth trying to secondguess what their masterplan might be. I would imagine that they're relying on that, if anything. Don't start worrying about who the lesser of two evils might be, or thinking tactically. Every single one of these fucks can and should go down, in whatever order. To…

The thing is that striking a nerve isn't that hard if you don't care about picking targets who actually deserve it. I mean, finding a rape victim and screaming rape jokes at them would probably "strike a nerve", but so what?

Lol at your actual gay panic.

"How about you stop calling people sexist racist and everything but the kitchen sink just because you don't agree with them?"

Sometimes inane bibble irritates.

Bill Maher is so left-wing that he's really really popular with right-wingers who hate the left-wing. His inane bibble about Islam is about as welcome as a 3am tweet from Richard Dawkins. He's irrelevant to us.

We were never supposed to be fun to people like you.

You say he's a "media force to be reckoned with". Can you give any actual examples of that?

We're not threatened. We're just angry. And based on how desperately the far-right are trying to claim that punching them in the face is the thing they MOST want us to do, and that they would so dearly hate for us to ignore them and/or debate them on popular TV shows… I'd say they're the ones feeling threatened.

I will happily listen to Holliday about what he did and how his industry works. But when he starts telling me the "right" way to respond to it, I am going to be very sceptical indeed. Nothing about the guy suggests that he has seen the error of his ways and wouldn't dream of indulging in this kind of thing again, oh…

Trump supporters who rage against celebrities getting involved in politics are not exactly bastions of self-awareness, are they.

You're talking about someone who can get his brainfarts published in Breitbart whenever he wants. If you're trying to imply that not talking about him will deny him the oxygen of publicity, you do not really understand how the media works.

"The idea of 'ignore the trolls' is so startlingly incorrect I'd say it's amazing it still sticks around, except for the fact that there is an infinite market for stupidity on this internet."

Holliday makes it clear that, when he ran his own campaign, they would fake complaints and threats and abuse if they were not forthcoming.

It's funny, because I've read a lot of books and papers by distinguished and objectively intelligent people who have contributed a great deal to the sum of human knowledge. And while they represent many diverse intellectual and philosophical traditions, nationalities, backgrounds and views, one thing they all seem to…

The thing is, the article undermines the idea that you can ignore these people to death, by stating that, if they're not getting the outrage they want, they'll just fake it.

"I've been making this same argument for weeks only to be told I'm enabling hate speech."

Given that I don't think Milo himself fully agrees with Milo, I think that's a completely reasonable response.