The dice told her not to, I guess.

I'm now picturing some kind of whimsical end to Sherlock where Cumberbatch recites the lyrics to "The Real Slim Shady" in a roomful of people who might be Moriarty's proxy and wears a little wax moustache just to hammer home how little fucking idea we have how to end stuff these days.

I think it's because he's good at finding good ways to innovate and mess around with a show's formula, to mix things up a bit. He's kind of the Darin Morgan of British TV. But the showrunner needs to be willing to maintain the formula the rest of the time, so that the innovations and deviations from it are still fun…

Not only a poster of Toby Jones, but a poster of Toby Jones with "HE'S BACK" on it.

This also has to be a clue.

"Also was it just coincidence that someone died, at the house, at the right time for Sherlock to find the first bust? That's a little ridiculous."

This is why people greeted his ascension to Doctor Who's showrunner with extreme enthusiasm, and now greet his departure with extreme enthusiasm.

When "The Sign Of Three" is more popular than "The Blind Beggar", I try not to care what the fans think.

"And then there’s Sherlock, who for the first time seems to be dealing with what his actions can cost others. At the episode’s beginning, he’s getting away with murder, quite literally. By the end, he’s dealing with the death of a friend"

Notable mention: all the many many times that newscasters have mispronounced "Jeremy Hunt".

One state uses the word "ornery" that often?

Well, I was surprise to find he was still alive, which means he'll probably die soon. That's what happened with Claude Levi-Strauss.

At least he's kept his shirt on.

Whereas "suicide spikes" sounds like something you'd put under bridges that aren't quite high enough for people to die from jumping off…

"saying as you did that Matt and Trey aren't "woke" enough to have a reasonable opinion on the matter."

er'm a big boy now

Why is that a good thing?

I wanna say the one with the midget in it?

Maybe I misunderstood. You seemed to be saying that lefties objected because their beliefs were being challenged. I was pointing out that that wasn't the case - that it was getting the actual facts wrong that was the problem.

I thought the thrust of this review was that they *shouldn't* plan ahead because their plans might have to change at short notice.