sterlingsilver36
SterlingSilver
sterlingsilver36

Rich text format is cool...

*sigh*

I was just thinking about you the other day!

That's going to be an awesome looking twist-out

In one of my classes today a student tried to play the "race is important because of people from older generations, we don't have to have it be so!" card. I believe that student may be a year younger than me. For whatever reason I'm always a bit taken aback when a POC says something in that vein, it's not as if it's

Why did he go from the younger version of what we see as the photo for this article, to the photo I've posted, to what we now see. I mean, I don't particularly think the Slash look is AWESOME but it seems 1000x notches up better than this. It barely worked for him when he was 20, it's certainly not working for him

Uhm, I don't know how old OkNoButReally is but I'm 22 and I'm fairly sure that it's not just a hairstyle. If we are in the same generation I don't particularly appreciate them trying to speak for the entirety of this gen. Then again, i'm at the tail end of Y and perhaps they are the one after.

The OP doesn't argue that. A critique of behavior shouldn't be met with an exaggerative response assuming that the person delivering critique doesn't understand what feminism is. Jeez.

Okay, fair enough. However, I didn't present the link someone else did and I replied. I can understand you may not think "too specifically" but just as you were addressing concepts brought up in my comment I was doing the same, and I guess my own reading of your comment was that you weren't thinking on the same scale

No it doesn't help at all.

Seriously. I don't get it.

See, you're thinking too specifically here (and honestly on way too basic of a level. No one is saying that calling her fat is the same as saying she did a bad job acting in a film. Things don't need to be perfect comparisons to be hypocritical). Their general treatment of Kim K. highlights hypocrisy, if you don't see

I don't understand why most of the responses, including Lindy's, are responding as if the OP is saying a feminist must love and respect every single individual woman ever and always. Their critique is legit, and you expand on it wonderfully. This particular round of criticism aimed at Kim K. could serve for a really

That just highlights the hypocrisy of it all, it doesn't negate what the OP said.

It's very smart to make fun of someone indirectly. See, by doing it indirectly you can always deny deny deny and point out you were simply copy/pasting from other sites, or 'reporting' as opposed to doing the act yourself. But, at the root, this is still making fun of someone just for existing in the manner that they

Myself, and all the other Rhode Islanders I know, very much consider ourselves a part of the New England. I guess this is one of those YMMV type of things

Heh, I was going to say something similar. Maybe they meant Penn State? Admittedly I mostly only hear about athletics when it comes to that school but I also don't pay much attention to school gossip.

Probably had time to edit if you really wanted a different comment. In fact, you may have about a minute left to edit if you see this reply in time.

If they did shrink 'em, they probably used a minimizer. Much cheaper than digital reduction

That's terrifying. It also looks like a cross between a fetal pig and a young bunny monster.