Did you A) decide to avoid gluten by choice? *OR* B) did your digestive system start saying NO to gluten? If you were a regular Taco Bell eater, I can see how it might be option B. Sympathies for your loss.
Did you A) decide to avoid gluten by choice? *OR* B) did your digestive system start saying NO to gluten? If you were a regular Taco Bell eater, I can see how it might be option B. Sympathies for your loss.
This is the most useless waste of time I’ve heard of so far in 2018.
I agree, Carioca, they’ve been wobbly lately. Perhaps those Univision layoffs (that they’re not writing about) have them under a ton of stress.
Perhaps the Univision layoffs they are scared to write about have got them down. Perhaps shitposts like this are their way of venting.
This is a good example of Gizmodo (don’t call it Gakwer) Media’s claim that a simple “thought” is a good enough reason to write a whole column. Well, I was sufficiently tricked into clicking. Instead of a fun little stream of knowledge, I find myself in a kiddie pool that smells like piss. Logging and leaving.
You intentionally misunderstand. I’m sure you know the point of advice columns is for each user to apply their own life’s situation to the advice given to the (possibly fictitious) submitter of the question. I’m sure the “I’ve got a significant other but I don’t want kids” posse greatly outnumbers the “I’ve been…
I wonder if talking about it will help him, or make it worse... I guess we’ll find out...
Patrick did not say “there’s nothing wrong with not wanting to be a parent”. Instead of “agreeing 100%”, you are adding on to his thoughts with some additional “kids don’t matter” thoughts of your own.
Fuck those spouses who think “she” doesn’t get to change her mind. You took a vow, remember? Was part of that vow withholding love and support from your spouse, for no good reason? No, it was not. Have a kid, or get divorced. If she craves having kids now, and the other spouse is dead set against it, there’s no good…
Just imagine how tough it is for those real reporters, who have to travel and find the news, only to have possibly pajama-clad, and probably drunken, internet rebloggers steal many of the best stories. Must be difficult.
Put your claws away. The world could use more fab people like Tara Lipinski, and it’s not your place to try to clip their wings.
If you wish to live your life waiting for bloggers to beam all the bad news to your eyeballs... I expect they will be able to fulfill your wish.
I agree with you. One of the primary pillars of Deadspin’s content is shitting on its competitors, such as ESPN.com, Ringer/Simmons, Barstool, SBNation, etc.
I’d argue the other primary pillars are:
2) Repackaging the sports reporting of others (SI, ESPN, TV networks, NYT, reddit) (this is the only one I come here for)
We’re talking about NORTH America here.
I took a break from gaming, and learned how to cook IRL instead. I’m regarded as some kind of local legend now, who is constantly barraged with party invites. It’s awesome.
So you’re (rightfully) “turned off” by this game, but don’t have better choices for your time? That’s sad.
“two separate university investigations that found him responsible for a pair of sexual misconduct incidents Thursday afternoon”
Do people really listen to Drew & Friends blather on for almost an hour? I can’t with that. Written article that I spend 60 seconds reading... sure, fine. But 50 minutes of unfocused Drew audio to my brain? No thanks.
counter-counter-counter-counter points:
Good point. I’d add that many journalists make their livelihood on getting people pissed off. Getting a nosy, possibly drunken, and definitely drama-seeking journalist to write a straightforward and uplifting story in an interesting way is like getting a child to eat their vegetables.