Of course you can, but please stop calling me Shirley.

yes, as long as you have a HDR compatible TV obviously :)

Yes, provided you have an HDR TV.

Surely you can still play with HDR on a regular PS4 right?

I have taught only yes means yes

She didn’t leave because she thought that if she keep him horny and not thinking straight the character he plays on tv would would want to be her boyfriend. She knew if he had sex or he got tired of waiting she was out the door. That’s why it was nothing but, “wait, slow down” then blowjob all night.

The OP talks about ‘super consensual’ as opposed to only ‘consensual’. So now, we’re going from ‘no means no’, to ‘only yes means yes’, to ‘super consensual’, to what exactly next? Maybe the new normal will be: I said yes, but afterwards I thought I should have said ‘no’, so now it’s a ‘no’ retroactively and you’ll…

I like the idea that our morality is shifting away from this, because even as a man, I dislike the notion that sex is predicated on overcoming a woman’s resistance. This is an actual conversation I’ve had:

Explain to me how he coerced her. He has no power over her. He’s not in a position of authority over her. If his fame gave him power over her, that was her choice. Ansari is probably no more than 140 lbs soaking wet, so he’s not even a physical threat to her. She engaged in sexual activity with him. He never had…

I am not a troll, I am a trying to demand answers or make excuses, what I want to know, is why, referencing #2 - she didn’t just leave? If it was bad sex, bad date, you leave. I’ve left bad dates, I’ve stopped bad sex. If someone keeps repeatedly trying to reengage in sex I dont want, I leave. She should have left. He…

Didn’t she refuse sex and left , they didn’t have sex.

He literally ignored all verbal cues to stop or slow down

Unpopular confession: I have said no when what I meant was, “I’m going to pretend I don’t want to have sex right away because I don’t want you to think I’m a slut but I definitely want to have sex.”

She seemed pretty annoyed with him from the start when she gets mad about the white wine at his apartment before dinner.

Here is where I’ll probably get flamed, but there were so many aspects of her story that sounded unrealistically entitled and just, frankly, willfully unaware. Grace describes going BACK to this man who had just gone down to her, and FULLY NAKED, “...sat down on the floor next to Ansari, who sat on the couch, she…

I think much of her recollection of the night was helped along by her friends. Until she told them what had happened, she had never even considered his behavior to be assault. She wanted him to stroke her hair FFS. She wanted romance, he wanted sex. I don’t know that I see this as revenge on her part and i believe…

My takeaway? Old time views on courtship and pursuit cannot co-exist with modern feminism. Do away with “non-verbal cues.” Millennial women cannot harp on affirmative consent and then say “But I gave you non-verbal cues.” Can’t have it both ways.

This.

There some parts to the story that show these two people were on two completely different wavelengths and had a lot of misunderstandings. At one point, she sits on the floor in front of him and says she wanted him to play with her hair. She says he thought she wanted to reciprocate oral sex after he already performed…

So this is pretty much what we expected out of the #MeToo movement right?