I really hope he fires Sessions. For whatever web of stupid reasons, Senate Republicans love Sessions. He's their little KKK southern gentleman mascot. They might get pissed-off enough to stop carrying water for Trump the way they have been.

I put The Woods at number two. But yeah, its basically those three albums jockeying for first.

Kinda messed up that CA has a law that lets old coots cut to the front of the lawsuit line. What if someone is facing multiple suits, and grandma wins first and takes all the assets? All the younger people who got screwed just as bad get cut off?

I had friends in high school whose parents preferred that they date college guys, because they're "more mature" than high-school boys. Which I found insane; for the most part (there are exceptions), it seems like college guys who pursue high school girls are college guys who can't get the time of day from college…

Clearly you're unfamiliar with his contributions to Dead or Alive's "Youthquake."

Just to be clear: it's okay to separate a man from his politics, but not to separate the art from the artist? Do I have this right?

I like the idea, and support the effort. It would be interesting to see a more one-to-one equivalence list; i.e., "Instead of [male artist], try [female fronted band]." Criticisms: this list lacks Bettye Davis, Throwing Muses, and The Gits. Also, The Hot Rock is Sleater-Kinney's best album, not Dig Me Out.

Speaking of Siouxsie, she should do the next Bond song. "Lovecrime," recorded for the series finale of "Hannibal," sounds like a long-lost Bond song.

I may be alone in this, but I've never read South Park as "we're right and everyone else is wrong" and more as "we don't know anything and neither does anyone else."

I read once that something like one-third of American WW2 combatants admitted to never firing at the enemy, even when under fire themselves, mostly out of fear of killing someone. I find that oddly heartening.

I think Siouxsie should write the next Bond song. "Lovecrime," which she performed for the series finale of "Hannibal," sounds like a long-lost Bond song.

Let's hire charismatic big guy Dave Bautista! Then, let's have him driving a car for 90% of his screen time!

Its very good. Light on story; almost Malick-esque. The structure of the screenplay is fantastic, and really drives the tension. It is probably No man's best movie, possibly the year's best movie, definitely not the best war movie ever.

There's a story of French and German troops joining forces in WW1 to fend off packs of wolves in the dead of winter. How is THAT not a movie yet?

Empire of the Sun. I like WW2 movies with uncommon points of view.

I think JL and JLU have left and come back before, so you never know. Worth checking out, btw; the voice-acting in particular is fantastic.

If you choose to define dangerous strictly, that's fine. We put people in prison to keep them from committing crimes- disrupting the public order, which our system of law deems to be dangerous. You can't defraud seniors, or beat your wife, or deal drugs while in prison. Actually, many probably have. But prison…

You don't have to physically harm someone to be dangerous. If someone burglarizes my house while I'm gone, I won't exactly feel safe anymore. If you defraud a person of their life savings, they won't be able to afford food, shelter, and medicine. If you set fire to an empty building you own, the fire could spread to…

People freeze up. They panic. They run. We are, essentially, self-interested creatures. The kind of reaction you're talking about is the same kind of thinking conservatives use to advocate for more concealed carry- because bystanders will jump in and save the day. Its not in our nature to save the day. It's the…

I wasn't speaking to this specific case, but the generally similar situations the original commenter referenced.