This article shows everything wrong that's happened to Gizmodo. I don't come on here often anymore but it's so sad this was once a great informative website, now it's just clickbait and bad articles.

+9,999 up points.

A “LIST” ISN’T A SLIDE SHOW!

Someone who’s not a closet homophobe.

This seems like an odd take Candace...

Amerry Heard defamed Johnny Depp in the editorial she wrote. In the course of fighting back against her allegations he defamed her. As to the specifics, like what specifically he said that was considered defamation I don't know. Basically the jury ruled that she lied and then he told a few lies in his fighting back…

Yup. Depp really gave her the finger on this one.

So care less then

Amber Heard’s legal team really shit the bed at the trial.

That was a defamation case.  Nothing was proven in that case. 

Zan and Jayna aren’t supposed to be asain and in early comics and In some of the tv shows they have eurocentric shaped green eyes. They are a little tan, but I don’t think they were meant to appear Asian?

Keneti Apa, one of the whitest motherfuckers you’ve ever seen, is the son of a Samoan village chief.

“Texas Senator Ted Cruz rode along with truckers to express his support for the photo op — I mean, movement.”

Provided that they are also allowed to drive on the roads they are driving on too.

The Fuck Your Feelings™ people sure don’t like having their feelings fucked with. 

The guy isn’t married nor does he have children. But nice jump to conclusions there sparky.

Why do y’all keep using intentionally unflattering photos of Britney? I know she often posts “regular” photos at home with messy hair and such on her social media, but you’re using photos from events that are less than flattering. There are plenty of photos from often the same events you’re using that are better…

I don't understand why the writers here dump on him so much

“No one has been luckier in life than Pete Davidson”

So am I misunderstanding the story, or do these laws tend to just criminalize knowingly spreading of a disease that requires life time maintenance. Did they make a distinction over whether the non-infected party new of the status and agreed? Because I don't see the issue in criminalizing knowing transmitting a disease…