Yep. It’s such a huge time saver to know that you can immediately ignore the rest of the statement.

I’d also add a high-visibility vest to your list of stuff. Not only can you wear it yourself if you need to walk outside your car for whatever reason, you can also tie it to your antenna, roof rack, or windshield wipers to make your car more visible and immediately flag to anybody passing by that you need help.

True, but “well clear” is a point worth emphasizing - not just a couple feet from the car, but a fairly good distance. The car with hazard flashers is a lot more visible than you in whatever clothes you happen to be wearing, so you want to make sure you’re far enough from the roadway to avoid the situation where…

True, but that’s not the point. 

Good question, but early 2000's Washington had a similar example with their football coach (who violated NCAA rules on ‘gambling’), so apparently “NCAA violations are just cause” wasn’t a standard part of contracts back then.

Of course he didn’t respond when a random person asked him to provide information (in writing!) about an ongoing legal/liability issue and media firestorm.

You’d think that’d be an obvious cause, but it really depends on how the contract is written. Here’s a nice analogous example that’s still remembered by people in the business of college athletics:

If you start talking salary at the end, then the HR team that you’re working with is not competent. Our HR team will have figured out the ballpark for the person before we talk to anyone.

it’s weird to expect a hiring manager to spend more than about 30 seconds looking over your resume in most situations

Are you certain that he isn’t a center? With where the NBA is in 2018, a guy who’s 6'10", doesn’t shoot, but bullies people in the lane sure sounds like a center to me...a slightly undersized center, maybe, but a center nonetheless.

Yup - the Hawks are a classic case of the old saying about how people are exactly as loyal as their options.

I’m not sure if that opportunity is big as you’d think. Yes, there’s definitely a niche market of people who care about the ability to repair their own smartphone or TV...but I’m guessing they’re wildly outnumbered by the people whose first response when their smartphone breaks is either “where’s the nearest store?” or…

Because GMs are convinced, convinced, convinced that unlike every other team, we really do have a system that lets us pick players better than the rest.

That’s how it read to me - they’re avoiding calling it a ‘toxic culture’ because that would point back at themselves for all the other aspects of the culture. Instead, by refusing to call it a ‘cultural issue’, that allows Maryland to just pin the entire problem on DJ Durkin and leave it at that.

Yeah, it’ll be have to be REAL bad to knock FO:Tactics off that hill

Yeah.

The best part about the tweet is that muffing a kickoff at your own 1 yard line only deserves a “Pretty Rutgers” rating. Like, for any other team this would be a serious what the hell screw-up...but for Rutgers, it’s just a run-of-the-mill, average screw-up.

I’m talking about subtractions like no cheese on a burger or no croutons on a salad.

I must be too cynical, because every single time I see an overwhelming amount of signs and advertising about a specific ballot initiative, I immediately assume some big corporation is behind the media blitz and most likely trying to confuse the little guy (aka “me”) into voting against his (my) own self-interest.

3) If you’re gonna go this route, just let team get drafted normally out of high school. All this does is suppress player wages for a year, which is bullshit.