Steam was not nearly as annoying as Battle Net at least. Also I think the whole physical copies just being a code in a box started happening because of the PS3/360 gen to the PS4/XboxOne gen switch.

I bought Fallout 76 at launch. Yeah you definitely dodged a bullet. To me the game is fun enough as it is basically Fallout 4's gameplay loop but Multiplayer, however the Bethesda launcher is the worst thing ever. I’ve had that thing forget its progress in downloads, forget it has games installed already, and have it…

This is worth noting as while Steam hosts the downloads for most games it does not have an exclusivity to how you purchase the games. There’s GoG, Humble Bundle, buying physical copies, etc. Steam was mainly just the place to host all the downloads for a lot of these purchases. 

Epic’s store isn’t fully built yet and does not offer great security. Plus I don’t want to split up my game library even more. I mean when Origins was first created I stopped buying anything related to EA just because I tend to forget about it, not to mention I do not care for their business model in general. Like try…

Fair’s fair Steam didn’t lock games behind an exclusivity deal. You could buy them on GoG, Humble Bundle, physical copies, etc. and they all just gave you a steam key option. 

This is so dumb of a response. They’re not going to care that you’re review bombing games that are a decade to almost a decade old.

This is Nintendo. I’m expecting this to be sub par VR for maybe a year or two, then they’ll release a better model. 

Sans the in game purchases I’m still excited to play this. I’ll wait for PC though.

Clearly this is some attempt to summon a Cthuluian horror.

They all tried to say “yes” but lobbyist influence snatched the word as it drifted from their lungs and replaced it with a “no”

Memo to Buzzfeed’s higher ups: Having an unpopular Mayor have the moral high ground to you doesn’t help the process either. Shape up.

This looks like standard practice for From games.

Alternatively back then, “Slap a Jap with War Bonds!”

I got there eventually!

No it cannot. Let’s just say that I can see healthcare and tax reforms getting sidelined because they can be seen as harder sells to a wider audience. 

. . . I am almost curious enough to look up if anyone was spreading lies back then that Pearl Harbor was an inside job.

Fair is fair Fox News probably would not have supported going into World War II initially either. 

Yeah that is more likely the case. It’s partly why I hate it when people point out a net worth and assume that’s all cash they have sitting around doing nothing.

Yeah, that’s more of what I meant. Wage increases without healthcare reform and tax adjustments just isn’t going to fly for me is all.

This is why I support reducing cost of living over wage increases though. If healthcare reform brings down cost per individual overall, that’s savings per person without wage increases. If taxes are addressed properly where the top 1% pay their appropriate share, maybe state taxes can be reduced on an individual basis.