Neat. I’ll probably play it expecting the narrative to be disappointing.

It’s either you pay a monthly subscription like Netflix - in which case the library is tied to what licenses Google is willing to shell out for - or it’s going to be renting games per time period basis like Blockbuster and such. That would mean more games on the service, but a worse deal for the player. 

Pretty standard phrase, sure. What’s it usually applied to though? 

“Bona fide business related reason” is vague in its wording and would lead to arguments in court. “Any other factor” is a larger umbrella catch all that leads to less argument.

Nah then they cannot do the Info Wars approach of fearmongering using little to no factual information. 

Cool. The others will do the same of course, no question there. 

Have a star! Because yes, related. Also excellent. Trump’s gonna have a meltdown. 

He sounds like he’s not qualified for his job. Maybe someone should fire him. 

Pretty sure if you give any answer you end up being wrong. The federal government doesn’t recognize any one language as the official language of the US. 

Flannel shirt with a can of cheap beer might be close. 

I would avoid “Final Solution” in any form as it still has negative connotations regardless of context.

That’s a bit more confusing to me as I can only find that statistic. However the site separated out Hospitals and the like so most likely those would contain that staffing.

I know, it’s just going to be a big negative that can be used against this sort of proposal. I mean like it or not, Democrat proposals often call for the elimination of jobs and that’s why Republicans are able to grab the votes of those that feel threatened by that - even if the threat of job loss is less overall then…

The supplemental programs would most likely be paired down though and therefore hiring less. As for federal expansion, yes it would include additional hiring. This would not match the demand of those working in the system as-is though as you have both redundancy elimination happening as well as a history of federal…

There would most likely be some transition however you are essentially doing a mass merger of companies into the government umbrella. Redundancies would be eliminated. Also the government has a history of hiring less then the actual demand requires so it may not necessarily be a good transition.

There still would be large amounts of job loss due to redundancy elimination. 

The good spin: Medicare For All as a system has already been found by Conservative groups to be costing less than the current system.

I guess it depends on how the taxes are handled. If the burden goes completely on individuals and not businesses then yeah, they get ahead a bit in the new system. Of course that may mean people getting coverage currently through their employers may suddenly be paying more as the current system splits the cost between…

Well yeah, capitalist society that’s built a lot of its money-making infrastructure on things running obtuse to climate change reform.

Sort of says something when basic Multiplayer needs to be patched in later. Games have done some mad things to make online FPS’s unique to one another I suppose.