Of course! Now stop arguing and lets eat grandma!
Stabcarrot
stabcarrot-old
@Clashwerk: Funny 'cause it's true.
This made me love Google the way one should only love abstract concepts like "peace" or "freedom" or... you know, "love". Srsly.
@prometeum: I was about to write something about the perils of COX inhibition, but it seems you beat me to it. Although the whole fear instilling routine may turn out to work a little less effectively than one might imagine.
@im2fools: Bingo.
@synchronicityii: So very totally, absolutely, definitely seconded. Like, amen-seconded even. There, I'm done.
@Dr. Nemmo: It's just not funny without the exclamation marks.
@FriarNurgle: I doubt the itch is about making it available for streaming in and by itself, so much as letting Apple grab another slice of the pie. They're already #1 in digital music sales. Let them grow even more and soon they'll be dictating the terms while you can't afford to say no.
@SEDAGIVE?!: That one strikes what might be something of a conservative bone in me as well. Guess it might just be that I like punctuation too much to buy into that "time saving" deal about texting — which of course isn't exactly dancing to the tune of the times either, I suppose.
@SEDAGIVE?!: For better or worse, Facebook arguably isn't what it was four years ago. Your reasons for not liking the service and dropping out are most likely perfectly valid, but as more and more revolve around social networks, not being part of one is akin to being behind. The world keeps spinning whether you or I…
@SEDAGIVE?!: Sounds like you were already behind a couple of years ago and just never noticed. Social is the new black, which is to say it's a very particular dull shade of blue.
@gerrrg: Basically, no. Neurogenesis in the adult brain is generally accepted to be close to zero, although with a few notable exceptions. The most notable one (and the discovery of which was the major source for renewed interest in neural stem cell research) is neurons in the subventricular zone which not only…
@jas4577: I'm assuming they meant to say that they "followed people aged between 55 and 65 for 20 years", i.e. until the subjects were between 75 and 85 (or dead).
@tshack: This is not a question that can or should be answered on the internet — at least not if you plan to in any way act upon the answer.
@RubiksCube: That's stating that they are failing, not why they're doing so.
@Michael Xuereb: You were this close to scoring on that one, then you had to go and mess it up.
@Lemonade: I'd look up the part where he says that "it won't be the only option" in reference to the app store, but I'll save it for someone more desperate for some extra Steve-time.
@Live N Learn: That you assume that "they are sitting on their butt doing nothing" does not change the fact that even sitting on their asses doing nothing, they'd be spending the 2000 kcal diet that you claimed they don't need. See my calculation above, then take into account the themic effect of food (that is, the…