sskendall
Kendall101
sskendall

Hey, what does mouth breathing have to do with anything? (I can't remember the last time I could really smell, I think I remember smelling cookies as a kid. Allergies suck.)

Stupid supply and demand, can't it just leave us alone already.

Well theres a PSA.

Sorry, I had to laugh, but this sounds like a BS condition one invents when asked for a weakness in a job interview.

I was joking. Your observation was humorous. My sarcasm was not as obvious as I hoped.

I dont know enough about this to have a personal opinion, but can someone explain why the law is necessary (or why a proponent would claim it is necessary)? What gap in the law does it fill?

I think that maybe racist, but not sure.

When I saw the preview picture, I thought "that has to be a birthday cake" (based on the weird limited gradient in the skin tones) my thought continued to "that poor birthcake, even without the wig, no child will eat that."

I agree with you completely on 3. But I do find the Oh look your forcing me sad. No one makes us reply, that is internal. It always smile when someone says they aren't going to reply and at least follows through, because doing so is almost as rare as when someone actually responds to another poster to admit fault

"Nobody would specifically prefer someone with a mental illness."

forever alone?

Okay, then why does the poster above not have equal right to screen based on either condition? If not then it is wrong to dismiss based on any condition.

The issue was one person said they screen to find out if potential dates have a history of mental illness. You now are claiming that you are interested in "fixing things". I must have missed the part where I said you felt entitled to sex (feel free to quote me), but I did say no one is entitled to an intimate

Well, good for you, I am glad I misread your reactions.

There is such a thing as preference for resilient people that can cope with reality, and dont crumble under adverse conditions. This applies to both the mental and physical spectrum. I am even confused as to how you could acknowledge it being acceptable for one to discriminate against one being in a wheelchair, but

..."so I guess we should just never try to fix anything?" When applied to personal relationships that you are not apart of in any way, yes, EXACTLY YES. Also the argument does apply to any type of discrimination in relationships. Feel free to advocate against people getting in the relationship. But you dont belong in

"People, men, women, or other, who have sexual feelings for any of the genders, will be attracted to whomever they find attractive. "

I was going to add a comment regarding the inherent sexism of most (all non bisexual) dating. But it appears you both beat me to it, and did a much better job than I would have.

I dont have anything to get over since I'm not the one giving unsolicited advice.

I am only posting because I would love to see a response to this post. Especially by the author. It seems ridiculous-fantasy-make-believe (improperly referred to as "art") is a one way street.