Eh....this isn’t much slower in a straight line than a CTR, and people are dropping $50k for those all day.

I agree with your assessment of buying the cheaper versions, but what is available under $40k that’s “really great”? A Nissan Z is going to be $45k, and if you want the “performance” version to make it remotely decent it’s well over $50k. You can’t even look at a CTR for under $50k. The most basic Mustang GT is mid…

This is happening all over the market, in the past this sort of behavior is the precursor to a dramatic crash.

The great thing about MCM is that they’re still doing projects that are reasonably attainable for the average car person, but as their skill and resources have improved, they’re being more clever and doing things the right way. They have the strongest DIY ethic, which makes them the most relatable IMO.

This is why Mighty Car Mods are the GOAT of auto YouTube channels. 

Then low income people have no relief.

Eh, I think it needs to be a big in your face sum of money all at once. You go to get your registration renewed and they want $5k for your big truck. People are funny with large vs. small sums, even if in the long term the small sums add up to more.

Yep. It’s the correct way.

You’d obviously have to have a line in the sand. Like, implement the tax for MY2026 and newer vehicles, so when people buy their next new car they know what they’re getting in to.

People are going to make endless excuses for this, just like they do all of BMW’s currently hideous lineup.

Instead of regulating the car companies for emissions, regulate the customer.

This is the obvious one. It’s this generation’s S2000 or ITR. They’re just so, so good to drive and so accessible.

This is exactly why dry sump isn’t just a reliability upgrade, it’s a performance upgrade.

If I like to drive, and I’m not concerned with being the best daily driver, I’m buying a GR86 and saving a huge amount of money. What’s crazy is that it’s not much slower than a CTR.

With dealer markups on the CTR and the ridiculous base price of the ITS, can’t see why you’d choose this over the new S3. I guess if you do tons of track days, but I’d like to see the numbers on how many of these actually see tracks.

My only issue with the F1 is that it was modified for the run. Had no cats, higher rev limit, etc.

I see these every day, and it is a cool engineering exercise. The main thing that will be interesting is how teams will choose to deploy the power, you may see big differences in strategy that will mix things up.

I simply think they’re presenting to the outside world the way they present it internally. It makes for an easy way to compare with their ICE revenues/profits.

Every OEM project I’ve worked on, which is quite a few, calculates everything on a per unit basis. That’s tooling, ED&D, software/engineering tools, part piece price, etc. Maybe this isn’t how financial people are used to seeing it reported outside the company, but this is is literally how auto companies figure out…

....how is it misleading? They’re spending money, and BEVs aren’t selling like they thought they would at this point. They still have an absolute amount of money they bring in, and an absolute amount they can spend.