I’m not usually into vanity plates, but I decided to get one for the fox body when I moved to Michigan. I really wanted 46NOTCH, but it was taken. Also, I took my lady friend to the local Autocross a couple weekends ago. She liked it.

When I got my Mustang running, I used these old and abused KYB Gas-A-Just struts that I had lying around combined with a craptastic coil-over kit. I had planned on replacing them eventually, but I ran across a deal on a set of bilsteins with very low miles from a friend I trusted. Ordered a Maximum Motorsports…

I’ve been thinking about what car appeals to car enthusiasts the least, the most “un-jalop” car if you will. My initial thought was minivans, but then I realized that while I don’t want a minivan I do respect them because they are built for a purpose. They are the way they are for a reason. A minivan has the same…

A Fox body Mustang was spotted at a recent Detroit Autocross event. Assuming the driver had become lost on his way to Milan Dragway, the driver was approached for comment. His response was as follows:

All ready for autocrossing at MIS tomorrow. If you’re reading this from the Detroit area, come on out and say hi!

A few days ago I made a grumbly post about the (incorrect) correlation that is often made between torque and vehicle performance. During my composition of said post, I assumed that the internet would join me in blasting the unwashed masses for their ignorance. Instead they tried to blast me.

Every time I hear someone spout the old axiom “torque is what moves a car” I want to vomit out my internal organs. Torque is a static figure, I can grab a breaker bar and apply 200 lb-ft of torque to the input shaft of a transmission but it doesn’t mean that I can move the car at any significant rate.

Just spent the last 20 minutes chasing the new Camaro in my ‘93 Mustang. Mustang is faster.