Archer would have great jokes if it could tell a joke and move on, instead of hammering it and explaining it over and over, spinning its wheels over and over on one punchline before lurching to another.
Archer would have great jokes if it could tell a joke and move on, instead of hammering it and explaining it over and over, spinning its wheels over and over on one punchline before lurching to another.
Eh, not really. The “temporal cold war” ended up meaning “a bunch of Star Trek episodes that involve time travel with no real through-line”.
“Good news”?
It fucking sucks.
We have Geoff Johns to thank for this Darkseid shit, don’t we
“tribalism”, are liberals not over that empty semi-Nazi catchphrase yet?
That sounds like your problem.
Your comment is genuinely disturbing: parasocial fantasies that these characters are real. You don’t appreciate scenes because they affect you or because they’re effective. You “like” them when the “right” fake friends win. This is not investment in a story, but in a deluded personal fantasy.
Yeah, this bad adaptation of a funny and occasionally clever comic book generally does have themes that insipid at its core.
The source material is infinitely more aware of its limits than this bizarre attempt to make it into a middlebrow TV show is aware of its own
Calm down, nerd
It sure was a bad idea to try to turn The Boys into a TV show.
Or you’re in denial. Yup, you’re in denial.
Yup.
1) Tan is a terrible artist.
A.V. Club really HAS turned into story time at the old folks’ home.
The main problem with Watchmen sequels is that they are, in our own very real universe, acts of depraved immorality on the part of Warner as a company.
Boy, you have not been reading DC’s comics much. And don’t get me wrong, that’s to your benefit.
I’d point out that Batman’s success is because he can be many, many different characters with widely varying tones...
That makes it in every way worse, not better, that it was a product of spite.